|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 04:44 PM Original message |
Ameresco lands $795M DOE biomass deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. well that fucking sucks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. perhaps you could provide a link to support your claim? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. try this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Biomass emissions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Ummmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 11:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Its just a list of unsubstantiated claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. wtf? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I find no reference on the web page you provided.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. sorry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Gosh! Thanks, Lets take a good look. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 07:52 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. woodfacts from a lumber mill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Would you like to review the draft Environmental Assessment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. mmm... that sounds delicious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. You're barking at the wrong bird... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Gosh! Ok, here are some facts provided by the U.S. Forest Service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Forest Service annual growth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnWxy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Fuel description from Env Assessmnt: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Aside from the fact that those numbers tell us nothing of the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. On the contrary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 11:35 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Please get down off your high horse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-24-09 08:58 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. There's more to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. In actuality... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Do you think they'll stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Forest Service lands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. THEY WILL OVERBUILD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Gullible isn't in the dictionary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 07:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. oh, fine then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 07:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Twas a joke, bud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. i do take offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnWxy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by over 100,000 tons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. this from the builder of the plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. No mention of how many megawatts these plants will generate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-22-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. They are basic thermal plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fotoware58 (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Really, though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 08:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. 50 MW... nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Is that number from your experience or is it directly related to the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Almost all Biomass plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 01:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. 50 MW for $800 million?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. It's actually worse... It is a 19MW facility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I thought it might be something like that since it is a federal reservation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-23-09 07:43 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. Wait, they're using a biomass power plant to run a nuclear processing facility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-24-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
48. No, Ameresco will be paid 800 Million from the energy and operational cost savings generated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC