Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Road to 35 MPG: Analysis From 2009—the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 04:53 PM
Original message
The Road to 35 MPG: Analysis From 2009—the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress
http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/how_to/4314756.html

The Road to 35 MPG: Analysis From 2009—the Society of Automotive Engineers World Congress

At this year's SAE World Congress there is a sense of urgency and excitement in the air as the gathered automotive engineers begin to tackle what may be the toughest challenge yet: Dramatically increasing fuel economy in the U.S. The government's 35-mpg requirement that goes into effect in 2020 is a 30 percent jump from today's fuel-economy standard. Since a new car takes about four years to design, test, and bring to market, carmakers need to stay ahead of the technology curve. So how will automakers hit that target? Paul Najt, the Group Manager of GM's powertrain research lab said, "There's no silver bullet." Instead, small incremental improvements in all areas will add up to major savings. Here's how automakers will do it.

By Larry Webster
Published on: April 24, 2009

Engines

Expect to see smaller engines, with plenty of efficiency-boosting features. Variable valve timing and lift will become much more common, turbos will be used to offset power losses from smaller engines, and gradually more engine accessories like water and power-steering pumps will be electrically driven. New coatings and roller bearings will reduce engine friction. It's also very possible that we'll finally see camless, electromagnetically operated valves. Of course diesels and hybrids will make up an increasing part of the mix, but those options have cost penalties. Those powertrains "must have dramatic improvements in cost," says John German, from the International Council for Clean Transportation. His opinion is not universally shared, however. Asian manufacturers pointed to the low-cost Honda Insight Hybrid, while the Europeans seem to be banking on clean-diesel technology. John Juriga, the Director of Hyundai and Kia U.S. powertrain development, said that "every company has their own unique path."

Transmissions

Kiss the four-speed automatic goodbye. The coming trend will be more gears to obtain a larger ratio spread. More speeds means the engine doesn't have to work as hard, saving fuel. Double-clutch automated transmissions will become much more common. Look at VW: "Our seven-speed DSG transmission can produce 14 percent less CO2 than a six-speed automatic," says Norbert Krause, the director of VW's engineering and environment. And of course, engineers will attack friction, with the same strategies used on engines.

Chassis and Body

The consensus we heard from industry experts? Aerodynamic development has somewhat stalled in recent years. But that will quickly change. However, the improvements will be subtle and perhaps not easily recognizable. Air intakes will shrink and windows will become flush with the body. Also, aerodynamicists will pay particular attention to the vehicle underbody, which accounts for 10 to 20 percent of a car's drag. Expect to see larger underbody trays on all cars. And lower-rolling-resistance tires will become the norm rather than the exception.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh good grief, just build a fleet of Plymouth Horizons.
Do I have to micromanage everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cleaning out the garage last week, I discovered old car ads from the late '70s
Edited on Fri Apr-24-09 05:11 PM by truedelphi
Cars were getting 28 Mpg in the city and 36 Mpg on the highway. Back in 1979 to 1981!

What is so fabulous about the raise in standards being cited here?

We have got to have the most backwards legislative, sold out Congressional body in the WORLD!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fotoware58 Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Subaru's
Yeah, I was very disappointed to find that my choices in Subaru's were limited to a mere 28 mpg on the highways. Sure, they will go over 100 mph but, I sure never drive over 80. Otherwise, I do like my Forester S class with a ton of bells and whistles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ANd these 1970's 1980's cars that go so well
On smaller amounts of gas were things like the Chrysler K car, and AMC's!

I do like the Subaru though - envy friends whohave them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. The biggest barrier to fuel economy
are the auto makers' own marketers who push the need for 300 horsepower so drivers can feel powerful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thats mostly a load of crap. Cars have gotten heavy again, thats the main problem
The engines themselves are getting more efficient over time, same goes for high powered engines. The Corvette with a 6.2 436hp v8 gets way better fuel mileage compared to the 230hp 4.7 v8 in my truck. 22mpg average compared to 15mpg that I'm getting, and those cars even get up to 30mpg on the HWY easily. My 01 Trans Am, 6 speed with a 350hp v8 does. The reason why it gets better is simple, its an aerodynamic, lightweight sports car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Designers squandered improved technology on HP and acceleration instead of fuel economy.
Add to that the growing share to light trucks and SUV and it's been ten steps backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. see post 7 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Apr 28th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC