Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney Developing Nuclear Energy Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:57 PM
Original message
Cheney Developing Nuclear Energy Plan
http://www.pubrecord.org/nationworld/1-nationworld/243-cheney-developing-nuclear-energy-plan.html

While Dick Cheney has been talking tough about Iran's alleged nuclear activities, the vice president has been quietly pursuing nuclear ambitions of his own.

For more than two years, Cheney and a relatively unknown administration official, Deputy Energy Secretary Clay Sell, have been regularly visiting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to ensure agency officials rewrite regulatory policies and bypass public hearings in order to streamline the licensing process for energy companies that have filed applications to build new nuclear power reactors, as well as applications for new nuclear facilities that are expected to be filed by other companies in the months ahead, longtime NRC officials said.

Before being sworn in as deputy energy secretary in March 2005, Sell, a lawyer whose roots extend to Bush's home state of Texas, was a White House lobbyist working on energy issues. He had also participated in secret meetings with Cheney's Energy Task Force.

In April, Sell and Cheney had both met with NRC officials to sign off on the final regulatory policies related to new nuclear reactors. Following the meeting, Sell had alerted a group of energy companies they could begin to take advantage of the faster application process, NRC officials said.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Someone I know who forwards me material about Depleted Uranium has
Some references that the world's known supply of uranium would only give us some ten to fifteen years of nuclear power.

Does anyone else know about this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I didn't know anybody was actively questioning this
but I always wondered whether anyone was concerned there might be a finite amount of fissionable material in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Peak U235" will make "Peak Oil" look like a fire sale.
We'll be halfway through building new plants and alchemy will be in vogue again. Only the willfully ignorant fundies will fall for it, but not before billions are spent on construction and research. Dog forbid the corporations don't get their cut of the action before it all goes down in flames.

That's an angle we haven't been working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, if nuclear is scaled up.
At current consumption rates and ore grades, there are several decades worth of uranium,
but if nuclear energy is scaled up the way some people want,
we will use up the easy uranium in about a decade.
Uranium is a limited resource, just like oil.
Like "peak oil", there will be "peak uranium".
Getting the very low grade ores will be expensive and environmentally destructive,
just as melting oil from tar sands and shale rock is more expensive and environmentally destructive than oil wells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much money does Cheney have invested in these
companies, or what kickback is he getting. Are these crimes yet, this is above and beyond simple pandering.

Hey Nancy and Harry what do you think? Is this enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is only a small part of his rush program to develop a nuclear
artificial heart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why does he time to be developing anything?
Hello? DICKHEAD- time's up! Maybe just try to develope a plan for evading the law just like you always do. I would think covering your ass constantly would take up the majority of your time! You don't have time for Nuclear Nonsense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here is what Dick Cheney knows about nuclear energy...
Hardly anything.

Understanding nuclear energy involves a detailed and subtle knowledge of science, and Cheney, <em>hates</em> science as much as Greenpeace hates science.

He knows how to work up ignorance about it to cause people to kill other people.

The ignorant fall over themselves trying to repeat his claims.

The guy should join Greenpeace after he leaves the dangerous fossil fuel status quo office in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC