Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is MSM ignoring bio-mass oil at $60-80/barrel but no costs of finding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 11:57 AM
Original message
Why is MSM ignoring bio-mass oil at $60-80/barrel but no costs of finding
Destroying ANWR, or looking under the sea, or extracting oil from shale is much more costly "exploration" than taking municipal waste and farm waste to make oil, albeit at $60 per barrel with free bio-mass waste - $80 per barrel if you are charged for turket waste as at the Carthage Demo-plant. Here we have transition to a non oil economy that cleans up leaky landfills, desposes of waste, provides water - and no media reports on it.

Heck even the DOE report that the demo-plant in Carthage as of February, 2005 (per answers.com)has received an economic setback as folks are charging 30 to $40 per ton for turkey waste that was thought would be free after mad-cow - but turkey waste under Bush is still allowwed to be used as cattle feed - making the final cost $80 a barrel (compared to $60 with "no charge for turkey waste" oil) and uneconomic compared to conventional diesel selling for about $50 a barrel, has not been in the media.

Thermal Conversion Process (TCP) -Thermal Depolymerization.
http://www.answers.com/topic/thermal-depolymerization
http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/ea/EA1506/appendixA.pdf
http://www.discover.com/may_03/featoil.html
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/4/24/02152/3927
http://www.changingworldtech.com/
http://www.changingworldtech.com/information_center/press_releases.asp?id=9

Promising Renewable Energy Source Excluded from New York State Retail Renewable Portfolio Standard
Keyspan Advocates for Thermal Conversion Process 6.30.2004
Julie Gross Gelfand
HLD/Blankman Public Relations
(516) 536-6811

West Hempstead, NY, June 30, 2004 -- A technology hailed by the scientific community as one of the most promising new sources of renewable energy in the world today has been excluded from New York State's proposed Retail Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), a guideline designed to increase to 25% the amount of electricity purchased in the state that is generated from renewable sources. KeySpan Corporation, one of the state's largest utilities, has appealed for a broader definition of eligible renewable energy sources, to include the organic process developed by Changing World Technologies (CWT) to produce a sustainable source of high grade oil and natural gas from agricultural residue and animal waste.

The New York State Public Service Commission released its Recommended Decision (RD) defining eligibility for RPS on June 3. Eligible under the RD are wood-based sources of biomass; as well as biogas derived from landfills, sewage and manure digestion; fuel cells; and hydroelectric, solar, tidal and wind sources. Absent from the list are plant, animal and landfill-based sources of renewable, carbon-neutral biomass.

In its brief, KeySpan states: "Agricultural and animal waste are viable biomass sources, and the process developed by CWT is environmentally benign and carbon-neutral… The exclusion of animal waste and other organic materials as eligible biomass sources appears arbitrary in light of the fact that animal and other organic waste, unless otherwise disposed of, will end up in landfills, and landfill gas is eligible for main-tier incentives. There is also an inconsistency in that animal manure is an eligible biomass source, but offal is not… broadening the definition of eligible biomass sources to include offal and other organic waste, the Commission will increase the likelihood of meeting the RPS targets and improving the state's economic and energy security."

Scientific Support In December 2003, Scientific American magazine named Changing World Technologies the most important energy company in America, as part of its annual Scientific American 50 issue. The Scientific American 50 recognizes the “singular accomplishments of those who have contributed to the advancement of technology in the realms of science, engineering, commerce and public policy.”

Other scientific journals, from Discover magazine to Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Technology Review, have also hailed CWT’s technology – called Thermal Conversion Process (TCP) -- as one of the most important new sources in sustainable energy development.

Discover reports in its July 2004 issue, “Out of 100 Btus in a given unit of feedstock, only 15 Btus are used to power the process, with the remainder residing in oil, gas and chemicals. Most important, the oil produced in these tests easily meets the specifications for diesel fuel.”

About TCP CWT's Thermal Conversion Process is a method of reforming organic waste into a high-value energy resource, without hazardous emissions to the environment. The first refinery utilizing TCP to produce and sell oil commercially commenced operation in Carthage, Mo., in May under a joint venture between CWT and ConAgra Foods.

Because TCP utilizes above-ground waste streams to produce a new energy source, it also has the potential to arrest global warming by reducing the use of fossil fuels, and to create a means of energy independence by reducing U.S. reliance on imported oil.

TCP succeeds in breaking down long chains of organic polymers into their smallest units and reforming them into new combinations to produce clean solid, liquid and gaseous alternative fuels and specialty chemicals. The process emulates the earth’s natural geothermal activity, whereby organic material is converted into fossil fuel under conditions of extreme heat and pressure over millions of years. It mimics the earth’s system by using pipes and controlling temperature and pressure to reduce the bio-remediation process from millions of years to mere hours.

The process entails five steps: (1) Pulping and slurrying the organic feed with water. (2) Heating the slurry under pressure to the desired temperature. (3) Flashing the slurry to a lower pressure to separate the mixture. (4) Heating the slurry again (coking) to drive off water and produce light hydrocarbons. (5) Separating the end products.

TCP is more than 80% energy efficient. In addition, it generates its own energy to power the system, and uses the steam naturally created by the process to heat incoming feedstock. In addition, TCP produces no emissions and no secondary hazardous waste streams.

Said Brian Appel, Chairman and CEO of Changing World Technologies, "New York State is one of the largest importers of foreign oil in the U.S. New York should have a vested interest in supporting the RPS eligibility of a sustainable domestic energy source that meets every criteria for environmental responsibility. The Biomass Eligibility working group, which formulated the definition of eligible renewable sources in this category, was dominated by special interests that excluded every viable and environmentally responsible biomass source other than wood. The Public Service Commission still has an opportunity to broaden the definition to be more inclusive, and we are hopeful they will make the right decision."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee. Maybe, they have their Investments tied-in there.
Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because they do not give a f*ck...
we have to push our local governments to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC