|
Debates are cruel to candidates, and do not show them doing what a president does.. thus are not good indicators of who would be a better prez.
A prez takes some time to consider a policy, and gets input. Debating is not part of the job.
A good debater may be a lousy prez.. O'reilley is my proof.
Debates are cruel stress to put on a guy. Plus, he might just be having a bad day. We stress our candidates too much in just the primary elections alone.
End the sadistic spectacle of debates, and instead have each guy with an expert team, give short presentations of their view on each issue. A chalkboard could be used, to chart a view when possible.
A panel on each side. Replies to the other side would follow, but without any interruption by the enemy. Interruption often lets the bullies win. Keeping all talk brief would avoid boredom.
OSCAR
|