Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debates bad: panel discussion instead, much better

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:56 PM
Original message
Debates bad: panel discussion instead, much better
Debates are cruel to candidates, and do not show them doing what a president does.. thus are not good indicators of who would be a better prez.

A prez takes some time to consider a policy, and gets input. Debating is not part of the job.

A good debater may be a lousy prez.. O'reilley is my proof.

Debates are cruel stress to put on a guy. Plus, he might just be having a bad day. We stress our candidates too much in just the primary elections alone.

End the sadistic spectacle of debates, and instead have each guy with an expert team, give short presentations of their view on each issue. A chalkboard could be used, to chart a view when possible.

A panel on each side. Replies to the other side would follow, but without any interruption by the enemy. Interruption often lets the bullies win. Keeping all talk brief would avoid boredom.

OSCAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. oreilley is not a good debater let alone a debater
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. But for now
a little sadism is not too bad, as Scalia might say. Pardon me if I wished the spectacle had gone on a lot longer.

Whatever the format I do think- no matter who is getting the advantages of style over substance- that in the long run the Dem candidate should strive to set fairness and seriousness in stone to end the shallow charades which endanger our republic. Carter was fair enough to Reagan, just too naive. The cheating took place outside the debate room when they stole Carter's book. By the time the debate started Reagan could probably do a better reading of Carter's poems than Carter himself.

Still, the formats should be totally removed from partisan tinkering and just one facet of a systematized presentation of candidates(likewise sanitized from slick style interference). No more Super Bowl and valueless strategy. No corporate schmoes paying and regulating the debate. And prohibit all network spin for 24 hours.

The fact that Kennedy was the first to benefit from TV style does not mean it is a great thing. It has not prevented very unappealing unqualified and corporate GOP trolls from winning using these tactics.
Make things fair, free from corruption and open the windows to new parties, new voices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC