Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

[The Nashua Advocate] 2008 Final 4: Gore, Obama, Conyers, Dean [VOTE NOW]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 01:05 PM
Original message
[The Nashua Advocate] 2008 Final 4: Gore, Obama, Conyers, Dean [VOTE NOW]
It's finally, here, folks: the Final Four of The Nashua Advocate's Presidential May Madness Poll.

The final candidates for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, after several weeks of voting and not a few major upsets/controversies, are Al Gore, Barack Obama, John Conyers, and Howard Dean.

Cast your votes here, and we hope you'll discuss your vote in this thread!

In the Elite Eight action just concluded, General Wesley Clark was disqualified from the Poll, Hillay Clinton was defeated, and top African-American pols Obama and Conyers moved one step closer to a monumental Senate/House blockbuster match-up in the final contest!

Phew!

Best wishes to all, and vote wisely,

The News Editor
The Nashua Advocate
Nashua, NH


*****
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a great site
Just voted for Al Gore and Howard.

Not sure who I will vote for if they both win. But what a wonderful choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wrong forum for this.
This forum is for discussion of 2004. Your poll is for 2008. Please move to a more appropriate area of DU so that everyone who's interested in 2008 can see what you're saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharonking21 Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I am posting here what I posted on your locked thread
If you cannot devise a way to count votes without discarding valid votes and entire candidacies, you have no business calling your site an election reform site. Such methods of counting are pure quackery and would be scorned by any election judge.

Readers please note--I believe this is part of a smear campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. Politics & Issues Forums 2004 Election Results and Discussion
Sneaky, sneaky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Since this is a "Dupe" thread, I will duplicate the comment I made
Edited on Mon May-09-05 11:42 AM by FrenchieCat
on the locked thread in regard to this poll:

Based on my experience, the poll being advertised here is not a bonafide actual poll, as votes are dealt with in a manner reminiscent of the 2000 Florida election under the supervision of Katherine Harris...where only certain votes counted, and others just didn't.

Actually Florida had a better system of voting. At least there...when they found overvotes, instead of throwing out all Gore votes, or disqualifying Gore from the race, they only threw out the overvotes. In this poll, they also throw out the candidate.

A site, where they set up New Rule!in the middle of the voting....rules not mentioned when they solicite for email addresses advertising said poll:

New Rule! Multiple computers on one router (like say...at an office) will count only as one vote, no matter how many email accounts or how many employees.

New Rule! Family members all have to confer and decide who will get the household's one vote, even if they all have separate email accounts. That includes families of twos, threes, fours, etc... Also includes roomates, etc., etc.

New Rule! Instead of throwing out the "alleged" double votes, simply throw out the candidate.

New Rule! If a website is an election reform website, please do not question it's integrity or vote count methods or anything else.

New Rule! Just give them your email address and shut up about it. Get out of line after they disqualify your candidate and they will publish your name and your email address on the internet (that you provided to them in confidence) for all to see. If this happens, don't whine, just deal with it.

New Rule! If you're accused of cheating, just get over it! Complaining or asking for evidence or proof just makes you a "sore" loser.

New Rule! According to this site, modeled after a GOP site, there is no such thing as perfect democracy. Grow up, learn to live it with, or go directly to hell.

New Rule! This poll is fixed so that Howard Dean and Al Gore will be the only competitors left standing. Even if both individuals have said that they are not running in 2008, Learn to like this result.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhl6277 Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. this would also be the result if the question were
who actually has balls in the party. boxer would have to be on that list as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Clark was disqualified in order to skew the poll towards 2 candidates
Edited on Mon May-09-05 03:18 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here we thought only the other people rigged polls.
Hope you get the results you've arranged to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashuaadvocate Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. To Moderator...
Edited on Mon May-09-05 06:21 PM by nashuaadvocate
...the irony is, I posted the other post in this discussion forum (the one you locked; see below, on the first page of topics) in order to remove the allegedly inflammatory language which got the post locked elsewhere. And now I'm being skewered for posting inflammatory material here, when my intention was to post harmlessly and non-controversially!

So, I'd ask that folks interested simply in the Poll, and not the issues surrounding the Poll, visit the other thread titled identically to this one (below), so that they can find the voting instructions for the Poll. The post which begins this thread does not have that information, and contains material I'd hoped to delete from my posting in this forum.

-- TNE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Locking
Degenerated into flame war, please continue discussion, sans flames, here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=108&topic_id=120974#120996
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC