Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone ever asked a Biblical literalist what it means that the Bible doesn't forbid...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:18 AM
Original message
Anyone ever asked a Biblical literalist what it means that the Bible doesn't forbid...
women lying with women? At least not that I've ever found.

For all these thumpers that take everything in the Bible literally, including an Earth being created in seven days, I just wonder. It's gotta' be okay right?

As a straight male it would be hard on me to deal with the thought that the sexiest lesbian couple I have ever known of, Ellen and Portia, are going to hell.

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they go for that, then wouldn't everyone go for something or another?
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 12:38 AM by RandomThoughts
And as far as I am concerned, someone of any amount of love and kindness, that is not perfect, like nobody is perfect, although not saying what might make them not perfect.

If someone is going to try to take them to hell, they are going to have to take me down also, since it would be no more fair for them to go, then anyone else, including me.

Becuase that makes sense.

So people should not go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. People don't go to hell. Hell is a bullshit invention of people trying to control everyone else.
In spite of my specific comment about Ellen and Portia I really do wonder if anyone has seriously pressed these people on this point.

There is no way out of this literal quandry other than to do cognitive gymnastics of Houdini proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You can certainly try,
but the narrow-focused will never yield. It will be exactly as you say, "cognitive gymnastics of Houdini proportions" ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The only argument for the existence of hell
would be a self created existence where by free will someone would not get out of it.

As long as you are willing to learn, and things change, hell becomes impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The concept of coercion to get capitulation is wrong
First off, if someone was going to let you go to hell, then they would not deserve any devotion anyways, so what I think of as the better spirit of God does not allow that, so no reason to fear it, and once it is not feared it does not exist.

So the whole concept makes no sense. I understand it as a social idea to get compliance, but love can't come from a threat based on fear.

And everyone has something that makes them not perfect, so the idea that some should go and not others also does not make sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. IIRC, it is mentioned in there once.
Sorry, I have to get myself to bed now so I don't have time to look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thou shalt not lie

I always took that to mean that nobody should lie with anyone else.

That pretty much covers the waterfront, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's all control freak bullshit.
I like what Lin Yutang said in "The Importance of Living" published in 1936. He was the son of Christian missionary parents in China and became a Taoist. He asked the minister, 'How can they torture me in Hell if I don't have a body?"

They had no answer for that.


"The Importance of Living" is a fabulous book, and nobody knows about it now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC