|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 07:44 PM Original message |
Best and Worst dating cities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Suich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hey, we're 5th! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Woohoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Woohoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm unsurprised to find that Bangor didn't make the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maineiac (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. That's because of you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maineiac (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. Check out #63 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. Well that's blatantly bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dropkickpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. #73 baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm skeptical of any survey commissioned by Axe body spray. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Colorado Springs is high is that list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPisEvil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. We're number 1, we're number 1!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't buy their statistical-based methodology, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. and even more surprising to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 09:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yeah, but Springfield likely includes Northampton, MA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-07-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. i guess it's changed since the 90s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForrestGump (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
11. Like I need any help with non-dating: Vegas is # 52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FuzzySlippers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Forrest, if you can't find any non-dates in Vegas, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForrestGump (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. It's a non-date! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FuzzySlippers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
12. I find it interesting that the data is only for the 18-24 age group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. It's really bleak here (Corpus Christi) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:41 AM Response to Original message |
13. Margaritaville has its perks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:42 AM Response to Original message |
15. #18. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BelleCarolinaPeridot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
17. Accurate ! #75 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
20. So I'm currently living in the top dating city in America? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
21. Um...Austn is NOT a great dating city. I'm young and single and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 01:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. What's wrong with you approaching a man? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. No, they're seriously just unusually shy. If a guy's too shy to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. It seems like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Point taken. But I just feel I shouldn't have to be the one to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. I'm certainly not shy, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. Well, you're saying she's too "into herself" if she doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Yes. (A long-response to a short-post warning) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. #59 - Orange County, I can agree with that ranking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuelahWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. Kansas City #80 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. How did SLC get a higher rating? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuelahWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Probably because of the young Mormon population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. I can testify to that......#80 sounds about right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
29. 78th?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
31. My city is a little too small to be on the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Many college towns are too small to be on that list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wtf? FRESNO beat San Francisco? How did that happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. The list must have been freeped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fenris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yeah, San Marcos is a great city for dating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
35. Colorado Springs as number 2 would be refuted by anybody who lives there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. This list must have been compiled using statistics alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
37. Phoenix belongs at the bottom of the list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
38. Gary, IN is 27th: This list is a crock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Why didn't they include that area with Chicago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harvard (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
47. My experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-08-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
50. Yeah! Top Ten for the sacred 'aina! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
52. I don't think I would want to be the kind of person... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC