Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anybody see Hostel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:33 AM
Original message
Anybody see Hostel?
what's the scoop?

I love the gory, violent horror genre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. not a liberally pure genre, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Wish I'd seen it.
I love those kind of movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unsavedtrash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. my younger sister said it was weak and to see Saw II instead. She loves
those kinds of movies and said that Saw II was almost too much for her. Made her turn away and felt sick. I am not down with horror flicks but I hope this helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I don't know if I'm down with the Saw thing
I don't want one-dimensional gratuitous gore--I get that in real life.

I want some style, some tittilation, some suspense, some I-can't-believe-anyone-would-think-of-that depravity . . .

not just carving, gore and blood. Did your sister say anything about those elements of Saw II?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I thought Saw II was bad, they just "mailed in" the sequel... wife really
liked the first one, it was more intense and they had better actors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked.
Not at all what I was expecting - I was expecting something worthy of the name TARANTINO. I was sorely disappointed.

Basically - it's like some 13 year old boys wrote it, and the plot? The plot devolves to something like "How many titties can we cram into the first 2/3 of this movie before moving on to what we've tricked everyone into believing is the actual STORY?"

I own every movie Tarantino ever had any involvement in (that I'm aware of) - this one will not be joining my collection.

So, in summary,

Titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, some fucking going on with others in the same room watching, titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, some fucking going on w/ 2 couples in different beds in the same room at the same time, titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, hey! where'd our friend go??,titties,titties,titties, blood and gore.


Save your money. And your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm in!!! You had me at ''Freedom Bags''
Titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, blah blah blah blah blah blah in different beds blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah, titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties,titties, hey! blah blah blah blah titties, titties,titties, blah and blah .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. you say "titties" like it's a bad thing
LOL

I was hopeful that it was at least a little suspenseful or scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not out here yet, but I saw "Wolf Creek" last week and boy it's brilliant
I went into it knowing next to fuck all about the plot, other than it had really divided critics into some who thought it was an excellent return to the good ol' days of early Craven & Hooper and those who walked out / hated every fibre of its being.

I think I read it got a cinema release in the US just before the New Year, so it may still be around - else you could import the UK DVD. I can't see "Hostel" matching up to it to be honest. A couple of critics:

"Wolf Creek is a swaggeringly nasty, self-assured piece of ordeal horror set in the Australian outback. With nods to Duel and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, first- time writer-director Greg McLean shows the neo-goreheads from the US and UK how it ought to be done. (...) This is the best Australian movie since Lantana, and deserves an audience outside the horror fanbase."

http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,4267,1571117,00.html

"I wanted to walk out of the theater and keep on walking."

"I went to the Rotten Tomatoes roundup of critics not for tips for my own review, but hoping that someone somewhere simply said, "Made me want to vomit and cry at the same time.""

"There is a line and this movie crosses it. I don't know where the line is, but it's way north of "Wolf Creek.""

"If anyone you know says this is the one they want to see, my advice is: Don't know that person no more."


- Roger Ebert, who gave it zero stars (I won't post the link as he gives away a scene which you shouldn't really know about IMO in the first paragraph).


Also, have you heard about Miike Takashi's film for the "Masters of Horror" series? Showtime pulled it because - in the words of the series producer (from memory) it is "the most disturbing thing I have ever seen." Anchor Bay USA will be releasing it on DVD however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I want to see that, but it lasted in theaters about 35 minutes.
I think it's showing at a "dollar theater" in a bad part of town.

That might work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That might even be better. :)
Just to push a bit of British, a couple of films to look out for -

Neil Marshall's The Descent, which IIRC opens in the US in July. A group of girls go caving and it all goes a bit wrong ... Very atmospheric and nicely put together, although I think it'll suffer internationally from the fact that the The Cave will have been generally released first.

Evil Aliens - a highly anticipated (well by me, anyway) splatstick romp, with the great Bouff (Pervirella, Crade of Fear). Jake West, the director, made the trailer available on his site a couple of days ago, but it seems to be down for now - http://www.jakewest.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. thanks for tips
the soft steady drip of a leaky roof, a sticky floor unwashed for a decade, crooked metal seats, cold temperature due to the dodgy furnace, recycled cups at the concession stand, a desolate semi-industrial landscape lit only by the lewd licking flames of a car fire in the lot across the street . . .

late show at the cheap theater it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sad little movie, the gore will be on the "Unrated DVD".
Tarantino should have been ashamed to put his name on the project. Crappy little "B" movie, predictable, bad acting, bad edits. Not worth $9.00 each. But strangely enough, none of my kid's friends would go. They thought it would be just another hamburger meat special.

More like bad cuts thrown away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I thought it was awful.
:puke:

I'm not really grossed out by anything but this movie was sick.
There was no point to the gore though. It seemed like they made it to see just how much they could get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC