Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ayn Rand -- conservative or liberal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
neverborn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:27 PM
Original message
Ayn Rand -- conservative or liberal?
I had always heard Rand's writing was ultra-conservative. A friend recommended that I read Rand, and responded in kind. My friend said she has no idea what I'm talking about, that Rand is very liberal and very feminist.

Eh?!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's hardcore libertarian
Unwavering faith in the free market, coupled with liberal social values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Alan Greenspan was once a disciple of Ayn Rand.
I agree with you. Rand was libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know!
Kind of ironic considering he once wrote an essay condemning central banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. She seemed Liberatarian to me
My reading of her philosophy says that each individual should be left to do whatever he or she thinks best as long as that does not impede the rights of another. I thought that was Liberatarian. I read somewhere though that she did not consider herself Liberatarian and thought that Liberatariansim was irresposible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Nice in theory but the nature of competition is to devour competition
thereby concentrating wealth which is why controls are necessary in order to keep the non-ruling class content with capitalism.

But since you bring up liberty..this is one of my all time favorite flash films...for those that happen across this thread...I tend to favor the approach of John Locke that some people really do need to be saved from themselves from time to time and within reason...especially where we are considering drug addiction although I am for complete decriminalization of drugs.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/liberty.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. This is what I can't seem to get past when we debate libertarian
Edited on Thu May-13-04 07:38 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
philosphy. How can one be socially liberal and a free marketeer in REALITY? A free market system is a capitalist system. A capitalist system MANDATES that for wages to avoid being inflated and the labor pool to remain in play that a certain percentage of people be unemployed at any given moment. If they aren't, labor costs increase due to supply and demand. Therefore, if one is a free marketeer, then to argue against the social programs that take care of those mandated to be unemployed by denying services such as medicare and rejecting social security as a state run program is to give to the wealthy and let the poor fend for themselves or depend on "charity" to care for them as though "charity" is more autonomous than a safety net (which it isn't) There's just nothing socially liberal about that in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftistagitator Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Socially liberal for Libertarians
Means the government doesn't tell you what you do with your life. They don't believe in the drug war, antigay politics, and stuff like that because they are anti-government period. It gets wierd, no enviromental standards, the personal right to own nuclear weapons, purely toll based roadways, and absolutely no social saftey nets are just some of the extreme positions they hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. I know exactly what you mean.
Edited on Thu May-13-04 07:49 PM by ALago1
What most libertarians say when I bring up similar arguments is that: if government was completely eliminated and private enterprise was free to pursue its personal interests, fluctuations in the business cycle wouldn't occur.

Yeah that doesn't happen in reality. At some eventual point in an economy's procession through a business cycle, the level of personal savings wouldn't equate with the level of investment due to a lack of demand for new products or uncertainty of the future. This is how an economy goes into equilibrium and it is inevitible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. But that isn't possible in a global economy..we wouldn't be able to
compete..if we aren't subsidizing certain businesses (not that I defend MOST instances where we do) and another state (read nation ) was..then that business would have an unfair advantage over our business and if business were free in an unfettered manner to go where they pleased...they would go ...as they do now...(thanks to the FUCKING CATO INSTITUTE) where they could save money and get things cheaper...if one wants to see LIBERTARIANISM in action...it's currently being played mostly by multi-national corporations which can do what they damn well please...BUY the policy if they can't ...only provide employment for a very SMALL portion of the planet's people while being the controlling party for themajority of theplanet's wealth.

It ain't working

Hell the people who have benefitted from the WOD ARE the same companies that have benefited from libertarian FISCAL policy...interesting the way that one pans out.

To me, Libertarianism is MUCH like a religion..complete with all the logical fallacies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. ack!!! Make the evil name go away!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. As kooky as Rand was
Atlas Shrugged was a great book, very entertaining. Long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. I agree
she is a great writer...she just happens to be WRONG philisphically...She is basically THE anti-Marx...taking a 100% polar opposite stand on economic issues with the communist party...no room for compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. She was a TERRIBLE writer...
that is why she is not taught in literature programs (just as her terrible philosophy is the reason that she is not covered in philosophy departments)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. you obviously..
didn't read her stuff...If you come into a book knowing what she believes, you will hate every minute of it...but if you had no idea who she was before you read Atlas Shrugged, you would consider it a masterpiece of fiction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gold_bug Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. I agree with mitchum and I've read Rand's fiction.
It doesn't matter if you understand the basics of her philosophy or not, Rand's fiction remains prosy and dreary. Her novels are inhabited by ridiculous cardboard characters engaged in a silly epic battle of builders vs. destroyers/looters which is several dimensions removed from any semblance of reality.

"(The characters in The Fountainhead) have this kind of sticky, gooey, pulpy, drama happening for them... (but) Atlas doesn't even have that, so I think (for readers) it's like a third or fourth removal of a mental response on a low level."
--Mary Gaitskill

"From almost any page of Atlas Shrugged, a voice can be heard, from painful necessity, commanding: 'To a gas chamber -- go!' "
--Whittaker Chambers, 1957
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. ooh hostile
You didn't actually read A.S. did you? Remember it WAS a work of Fiction.

Fountainhead was kind of melodramatic with lots of self indulgent wallowing. It was fun to read if only for the naked anti-Marx propaganda.

Still, I found Atlas Shrugged to be one of the most enthralling novels of the 20th century. Depending on how old you are your parents probably read this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. I picked it up at the age of !4 with no knowledge of her...
and even at that age, I recognized it as turgid tripe. Unfortunately, I waded through all the rest of her work. The same result. There is not a single literary critic or scholar (or even lover of great writing) who considers any of her works to be masterpieces. You're an odd duck. I have never met anyone outside of her cult who considers her to be even a marginally talented novelist. Oh well, there's no accounting for taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. I've read the Fountainhead
and let me put this in context, a girlfriend recommended it to me so lets say that I had every motivation to like it and still I ended up arguing with her about it. It seems so cookie cutter and false to me that I couldn't ever really take it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ayn Rand was a spoiled selfish rich girl so displaced by the Bolshevik
revolution that she had to invent a philosophy to cope with her loss. Her philosophy largely is rooted in conservatism and the "Objectivists" preach it...she believed the ruling class was largely benevolent if left unencumbered by government.

Alan Greenspan was one of her disciples..if you've heard him speak has a liberal ideal ever dropped from his lips?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Good analysis! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I fail to see how one can even pretend to be objectivist when every piece
of information they consume is filtered by their own very non-objective mind. I think it's a myth...one that fools the believer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. the more someone screams "objective! sane! rational! reasonable!"
the faster I count my silverware.
That's why I tend to disbelieve the rhinestone-studded pedants that scream "I'm a debunker" out the window every morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. A powerful emetic...
Read her book For the New Intellectual if you ever need to :puke: .

In brief:

YOU are smarter than other people, which means that YOU are better than they are! Poor people are not like YOU. They are lazy, they are stupid, they have earned their suffering. YOU are the NEW intellectual; YOU should not care what happens to those lazy, weak, stupid, poor people.

Rand is not a conservative; she is an even lower form of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That fits in with this administration, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. "The Virtue of Selfishness"
not exactly a liberal ideal.


Feminist? If feminism means submitting to a powerful man, yes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Individual over the collective.
Her philosophy askes the question. If someone is falling in front of a train, should you risk your life trying to save them? She thinks one is only morally bound to save them if you "love" that person being either friendship or family. If it is a stranger and you are uncertain if harm will come to you, you have no moral obligation to attempt to save them. They are basically nothing and unconnected to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pretentious Gasbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. LOL-----------But
I also thought of her as a raging wingnut, but now agree with the posters who pegged her as Libertarian, and now I see her closer to those PESKY CLASSICISTS (without the overt antiquities overtones)------NIEZSCHE, Leo STRAUSS, and now PAGLIA and Victor Davis HANSON. What old Libs used to call "selfishness" in the old wingnuts, might now be seen as values unshaded by Christianity-------PRIDE (GLOATING), winning (DOMINANCE), etc.

Otoh, "Pretentious Gasbag" works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Hahahaha! With an accent
There is a great interview somewhere online with Tom Snyder and Ayn Rand back during the seventies from one of his late night shows..I came across it yesterday while posting to another thread....gasbag was the puuuurfect term.

And fucking boring writer too...I suffered through all her books in college.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Something I found weird about Objectivists
When I was a freshmen, I checked out the Objectivist club as one off many clubs that checked out. What I found odd was that they preached the superiority of reason and individuality. When they were asked tough questions though, they quoted Ayn Rand's words like they were religious scripture. They didn't use any of their own reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. I highly recommend the movie 'The Fountainhead'. which....
is the name of one of her books. She wrote the screenplay for the movie, which stars Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal (1949). It is, at times, extremely heavy handed and at other times truly comical (unintentionally). It is, at all times, genuinely entertaining. I don't want to say it's bad, but I can't say it's quite good either, but it does provide a great look into her extremely thinly veiled "philosophy", and is well worth watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Is that the one about the architect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. The quarry scene is a camp classic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gold_bug Donating Member (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. a feminist?
"For a woman qua woman, the essence of femininity is hero-worship -- the desire to look up to man."
--Ayn Rand, "The Objectivist," Dec. 1968 - "An Answer to Readers (About a Woman President)"

It seems to me that her essay on "Woman President" posits women as being inherently inferior to me, not because they are objectively inferior but because they all truly believe themselves to be inferior, therefore, are inferior. Or something like that, Rand's reasoning is almost always twisted in that manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Thanks for finding that..I knew there was a post I wanted to come
back to...yeah convoluted...just like life today after living through her economic policies (mostly) put into action since Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. seem to me that she saw herself as one of that
Edited on Fri May-14-04 05:41 PM by tigereye
amazing elite who were destined, no, preordained to run things. As if she were the only woman with the intellectual ( snort) power to do so. Not very feminist to me. However, there are some of her books - Utopia?- that seem to have a softer tone. I don't remember though, it has been a long time since I was obsessed with her books. I have no idea why, now. :)

so I guess elitist would be a pretty good description
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. Your friend is wrong. Next issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. The real question is: how do you pronounce 'Ayn'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I pronounce it like Ann, but some have corrected me...
and said it is pronounced as the word "Ein" Finnish name evidently

My response is that if you are going to change your name from Alissa Rosenbaum while moving to the US you should be more careful to either choose a spelling that will work better in your new country or not choose your name from a language as uncommonly known around the world as Finnish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:03 PM
Original message
It's pronounced "Alice Rosenbaum" (since that is her real name)
I swear to God, she just never out grew that annoying pretentious teenage girl stage, did she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuringBot Vers 2.0 Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Illogical raving lunatic.
Scanned her book once, hard to process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. Psychopathic reactionary.
Her well-to-do bourgeois family lost everything in the Russian Revolution and was forced to flee. Her philosophy is one of reaction against everything represented by Communism or Socialism. That's it's whole raison d'etre. The woman was, throughout her life, in need of serious psychoanalysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. She was plagarized by that hack fantasy writer Terry Goodkind
Apparently his sixth book in the "Sword Of Truth" series (bleech) is Rand's "The Fountainhead" taken almost scene for scene.
But I've never read Rand's works myself. I find her "minemineminegimmegimmegimme!" philosophy to be repulsive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. I read several thousand pages of her work....
and of it, there were three paragraphs that were good, the rest was tripe of the highest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. Tone deaf selfish loon
terrible novelist
terrible philosopher
terrible human being
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
37. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v2.0
==================

The time now is 11:03:04PM EDT, Thursday, May 13, 2004.

There are exactly...
3 days,
0 hours,
56 minutes, and
56 seconds left in our fund drive.

This website could not survive without your generosity. Member donations
pay for more than 84% of the Democratic Underground budget. Don't let
GrovelBot become the next victim of the Bush economy. Bzzzt.

Please take a moment to donate to DU right now. Thank you for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
38. Objectivism defined
A moralistic justification of greed and selfishness based on a poor reading of Aristotle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. Pompous psycho.
Edited on Thu May-13-04 10:26 PM by JohnLocke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. And not only that, she was a lousy philosopher!
Objectivism is full of strawmen. Rand would misquote someone and then criticize them on the misquote. Very sloppy. Here's an example:
http://home.att.net/~sandgryan/writings/emerson.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. One of the few generally discredited philosophers
"The Virtue of Selfishness" is a laugh riot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
48. My sixth Sense is: I see Objectivists
check out the Op Eds on http://www.aynrand.org if you want to see how truly wacky the whole group is. I recommend any on environmentalism, multiculturalism or Columbus Day. See what your friend thinks of some of those op eds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
49. Scribbletarian
Hero worshipping Social Darwinist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. LOL!!!
"Scribbletarian" That is perfect :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
51. She hated communists, existentialists, Buddhists, and "barefoot savages."
I'd call her arch conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
52. Every library copy of The Fountainhead in the entire world
opens of its own accord to the rape scene. I think that's the only scene most people are able to actually get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. LOL. FINALLY the plot begins to move!
Oh wait, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southpaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
55. Rand... how my opinion has changed over the years...
I used to think she was a bold and daring philosopher... I was inspired by Howard Roark, John Galt, Hank Rearden, Dagney Taggart, Dominique Francon...

Then I started to look past these monolithic icons of 'rugged individualism' and see the selfishness, greed and lack of compassion that seemed to define all of them. I tried to imagine the libertarian utopia of "Atlas Shrugged" and just couldn't seem to make it work...

I now see Rand as a total crackpot... a person whose view of communism was a reactionary one that precluded any semblance of objectivity (ironic, ain't it...)

She was very freeperish in the sense that her mind was made up on issues of economic justice and would hear no arguments to the contrary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. Worm Food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC