Hillary as VP

[Killarney]

I just read through this week's US News & World Report and in two separate stories it reports that both Clark and Dean are considering Hillary Clinton as their VP.

This is the first I've heard of it. I thought she was holding out to run for President in 2008 or 2012. Has my head been in the sand???

So... do you think there could be a Clark/Clinton or Dean/Clinton ticket?

What would you think of her as VP? Good/bad? Able to beat Bush?

[KA]

1. that would be so stupid

if hillary was on the ticket we would get the full rath of the right wing. they hate her with a passion

[Cleita]

3. And why would we care who they hate?

[kixot]

2. I'd rather senator Graham get the ticket.

Personally.

[Dagaz]

4. Maybe if Clark wins

But no way with Dean. Dean and Graham are getting close and he's already hired Graham's daughter.

[slor]

5. Hillary is too far to the right at this time for...

my taste. And I am serious. She supported the war and the patriot act
and is opposed to gay marriage. I oppose the war, hate anyone that dares to empower that freak asscroft, and have no qualms about same-sex marriage. So I hope she remains a senator in New York thank you!

[knight_of_the_star]

6. NO

Do you REALLY want our candidate to put a big fat bull's eye on themselves?

[lancdem]

7. She said in an interview that she won't be VP

Everyone here can relax.

[Orrin_73]

8. Freepers would freak out!!!

deanforamerica.com
clark04.com
kucinich.us
sharpton2004.org

[mlawson]

9. It would suck the LIFE out of our prez nominee's campaign.

FAAAAAR worse than the media-created 'scandal' about Geraldine Ferraro's husband's supposed misdealings, and subsequent refusal to run over records. That flap went on for several days (weeks?), and Mondale couldn't get one serious message out during that time.

But with Hillary, it would be Vince Foster, whitewater and Travelgate, 24/7! The fact that these scandals were judged to be baseless would not matter, of course...