Was Saddam a fool not to surrender to the British? (or other EU nation)
What do you think?
Personally if I was Saddam I would have found the quickest and safest way to the EU to surrender.
The US has no reservations concerning tortue/death.
Then again if I was in his postion I might want to die too...
But anyway - an EU nation would have been far more humane. I don't see why he didn't.
(disclaimer: I opposed the Iraq war, but I see little problem with Saddam being jailed in a civil manner (no tortue/death) if convicted of horrible crimes, as with any human)
I doubt it... Handing a person over to another nation to be executed is not looked on well in western Europe. Of course if he REALLY is just aching to loose his job I suppose he could add fuel to the fire...
9. I think the Brits have already done this with other captives
haven't they? The whole issue of following international law, treaties, norms, etc. seems to be spun out of control. Ther are not prisoners of war because this is a war unlike any other war etc etc
The whole concept of not extraditing prisoners to nations that will execute them is NOT (entirely) based on international law, treaty, etc, but rather internal policy.
which is what he'll probably get anyway after agreeing to a statement saying that dubya was right all along
Idi Amin's place in Saudi is free
Blair would absolutely have handed him over - so would most European countries - what elese could they do, he can't be tried at the Hague without the agreement of the Iraqi government which wont exist for some time (if at all)
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.