Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't panic. Saddam's Capture now = Good thing for us.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:20 PM
Original message
Don't panic. Saddam's Capture now = Good thing for us.
Don't worry. Today the bastard may walk with a smirk on his face but it will be short-lived. After the "Victory" high wears off (not unlike the day after a night of good sex) people will be asking questions. Both Iraqi and American.

"Now that we have Saddam, we/the Americans can go home now, right?"

Wrong. We are still stuck in Iraq for the long haul. This will make us look even worse to the Iraqi's -- especially seeing as how their last fear has been dispelled. (Saddam is gone, why are you still here?!)

This of course, will mean more attacks on our soldiers, leading to more deaths, which will translate into bad things for Bush.

Oh, and let's not forget the questions that will arise, "I thought all those guys were fighting for Saddam?! We have him captured! Why are our troops still being killed?!"

If you hate Bush as much as I do, then I suggest you put on a smile and congratulate him thoroughly. Play up Saddam's capture. Make it sound like Bush himself -- alone -- walked into Iraq and fought off an entire army single-handedly, then personally captured Saddam just to bring him to justice. That way when the shit hits the fan: Bush gets chopped to chunky bite-sized bits.

This is the begining of the end for Bush. The only way he will be able to survive the oncoming storm is to get the hell out of Iraq now... and if he does that in and of itself brings complicated problems. Either way, in the end, Bush is going to lose far more than he thought he'd gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. What I'm wondering is "what are they going to charge him with?"


Resisting an illegal, invading force?

Killing thousands of Iraqis with the explicit blessing of Ronnie & Poppy?

Thinking about having "Weapons of Mass Distruction"?

Not giving Halliburton a better deal back in 1999?

Fixing elections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BertrandL Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. War Attrocities going way, way back
Gassing the kurds
Gassing the kurds again
Forced relocations
Mass executions and purges
Illegal invasion of Kuwait
Political torture
Non-political torture
Trying to have Bush I assassinated
Writing terrible, terrible novels
Gassing the Iranians
Genocide

You know. The usual brutal dictator things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Uh-huh.


So you think they are going to use the international laws, that the US has seriously violated, to prosecute him with?

Remember, that most of what you mentioned above, the US was an active participant with him.

I think he's a complete bastard and I don't actually give a damn about him, but I'm much more curious how Bush is going to avoid getting entangled in the same laws that he's planning of persecuting with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree
Though I don't think it was accurate to equivocate the furthering of violence in Iraq with a good thing for us, which your post nearly did. That being said, I agree wholeheartedly that Bush will find this to be a Catch-22. Who will the boogeyman be now that you got the boogeyman caged? How will we function without a boogeyman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They're cashing in Saddam because they have a new "boogeyman"


His name is Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Can't ignore facts.
I'm glad that Saddam has been captured -- he was a horrible man that did horrible crimes, with the backing of horrible American Presidents. Hopefully that will come to light.

However, we cannot overlook or ignore the facts. It is a bad thing when Troops die in Iraq -- I feel for every family that loses a son or daughter. My own brother in law spent six months in Iraq, missed the birth of his first child, and may be going back after New Years. But *ANY* American deaths that happen as a result of that war can be laid at the feet of the Commander-n-Chump. Americans see that and therefore his poll numbers fall, which indirectly translates to rising poll numbers for us. It's sad that more people must die in order for Bush to be removed from power, but the fact is many more will die if he is allowed to remain in power.

Personally, I am willing to capitalize on whatever is thrown my way, because I know Bush and his Administration will be doing the same. Politics is a cut throat game with high stakes -- someone is always getting hurt -- but the fact of the matter is it's a game we can't afford to lose.

As much as it sickens me to be playing a "game" by the Republicans "rules", I've come to understand that any semblance of morality in politics died the moment Bush was placed into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Almost exactly the same thing I said in another thread
...and I doubt if we're the only ones who can see it this far ahead.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=906207

The one thing that may complicate it is that, if they're smart, they'll use the lengthy war crimes/human rights tribunal on Saddam to help build unity in the country and isolate the insurgents. Which would be a good thing, I have to keep reminding myself, even if it is also good for the Flying Chimp's election position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I totally agree
those of us who are antiwar and the cannidates who are anti war need tp stay on messaage.Our cannidates started while the war was popular and we still protested while the war was popular we made it throughthe first bombings and the "end" of the war with statue pulling and all
the media whores will treat prince georgie as His Holy Emperor George Freedom loving Bush for awhile. and will make it out as if he personally lassoed saddam himself for a couple weeks but we need to stay on message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Opi concurs
yup, the deficiet is still $490,000,000,000.08

This guy is bankrupting us for 1 cowardly asshole who couldn't bring himself to pull the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Would it have justified anything if Hussein had been killed...
...the first night of the war? Remember, that's what they told us for some time.

There's certainly no logical relationship between Hussein's capture, basically cleaning up after a military op that failed months ago (his assassination by missile), and the rationale for going to war.

However, weak-minded individuals will accept the propaganda that the two items are connected somehow. If this had happened in October 2004, it would be a classic PR 'October Surprise', and might have a huge bearing on the election. Next November, it would have affected Bush badly if Hussein hadn't been caught, but I'm not sure it helps him that positively, once today's media 'sugar rush' wears off.

And the war slogs on...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. This could end up a disaster for Republicans.
An open trial could expose Repugs and their dirty business. They'll have to insist on a hand-picked Repug prosecutor who will agree not to delve too far into the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There will be no open trial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Totally agree.... bad news for Bush in the long run, though they'll
spin it as best they can...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Consolidating threads on a very hectic day.....
Please continue the discussion here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=904501

Thank you for your patience and understanding.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC