Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some interesting comments by Tony Coelho last night on Charlie Rose...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:52 PM
Original message
Some interesting comments by Tony Coelho last night on Charlie Rose...
The ultimate insider, he spoke first about the Dean campaign, but said 2004 depends on Bush screwing up. The power of the incumbency is the most important factor; he said Americans get comfortable and don't like to change. While he was, as he described himself, a political animal and enjoyed how the Dean campaign and all the hoopla was going, he did not transfer his enthusiasm into a prediction in the 2004 election and Dean's chances. In fact, his discussion of incumbency left me feeling that he had his doubts.

On the Gore matter, he clearly stated that Gore liked the idea of being involved and by supporting Dean he could go after Bush without having to run. He said Gore had business interests and now he could attend to them and drop in and out of the political season whenever he wanted to.
If found this rather disturbing, because it seemed to indicate that Gore had some personal agenda in all this over and above endorsing Dean.

Later, on CNBC, Ed Rollins was asked if Gore was the head of the party and he said no. He said Gore had the chance after 2000 and dropped out of sight for a year. Which sort of buttresses Coehlo's feeling about Gore coming in now in a way that is convenient.

Gloria Borger commented on how many Dems were angry about the timing and I myself wonder if there will be a lot of "sitting on hands" down the road.


(Some of this posted on other threads....finally got around to posting it on its own.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw him on Scarborough and he was very enthusiastic about the
endorsement.

He also said all the media speculation about a Gore Clinton was sophmoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, Glad To Get The Chance To Read This
I don't put much stock in the Clinton/Gore Civil War although I DO think Dean has had designs on being a "Power Broker" since the moment he became Lt. Governor.

It'll be interesting to see how this all shakes out...

But regarding Gores's endorsement... congratulation due to Dean but that Gore suggested other Candidates fall in line and thier activists as well is just REALLY bad form...

IMO it's almost as if Gore WANTED to sabotage the endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC