Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's be honest: Had Nader sat out in 2000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FuriousMNDem Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:13 PM
Original message
Let's be honest: Had Nader sat out in 2000
Over 400 American soldiers would probably still be alive.

Gore said he would not have gone into Iraq.

Go ahead, flame me, but it's the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No arguments here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Time to move FORWARD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:15 PM
Original message
Live Bait
Get it while it's fresh...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. hey, a psychic!
Will I get a raise soon?

Tell me, what do you make of the fact that the GOP stole the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuriousMNDem Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nader enabled them to steal it. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. had Nader never existed
they've have stolen it anyway. What's a few thousand more disappeared Florida votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. The difference between Gore and Shithead in Florida was less than 1%
...With Nader out of the loop and Gore likely having the additional 2% of the vote, a 3% margin would have been considerably harder to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Did you see the documentary 'Unprecedented'?
Edited on Tue Dec-02-03 04:34 PM by htuttle
It's about the 2000 election, and has been running on Sundance the last few months.

Among other things it pointed out, it was quite clear that had Gore asked for a statewide recount, instead of a smaller 'targeted county' recount, he would have easily won. Gore himself said that he probably *should* have asked for a statewide recount, but his political advisors thought it would be better to target those counties where he thought he'd done well. Whoops.

There were a WHOLE number of things that could have changed the outcome of that election. Focusing on Nader to the exclusion of the rest of them is a crass Republican ploy to divert attention from the crime that was Florida 2000.

If your handle is 'AntiCoup2k', you should already know this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. that doesn't matter
the DNC machine has made Ralph Nader the reason for all the problems of the left, and there are certain folks who take that info trinket at face value and gladly regurgitate it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I'm well aware of everything Jeb, Kate, Baker, etc did to steal Florida
However, in spite of all that, the extra 2% that went to Nader would given Gore the clear victory and spared the recount fiasco altogether. Ralph has been quoted as saying that he hoped Junior DID win, so that it would force the Democrats to the left. Obviously that strategy failed as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Gore DID ask for a statewide recount..
in the first week or so after the election. Bush refused. Go figure :shrug:

And Nader siphoned off something like 93,000 Florida votes.
The bottom line is, Nader intended to throw the election to Bush all along.

http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010423Baker.html

and this time around he'll most likely have to run as an Independent, because us Greens have wised up. (I voted for Gore, in case anyone's interested, and have been holding off changing my registration back to Dem because I want to set my Green card on fire and shove it up Nader's duplicitous arse first).

http://realchange.org/nader.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. So don't blame the Republicans, Don't blame the prostitute press
Don't blame the Brooks Brothers Riot, Don't blame the Supreme Court.

In fact, don't blame any of the real problems. Find a scapegoat.

Nader! (flame) (Good boy, here's a biscuit...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's be honest:
Dumbest flame thread ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. threadjack..
POOTIE!



TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. truth? sound like conjecture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's up to us to see it doesn't happen again.
If Dean gets the nomination, more than the Greens will refuse to vote for him. Lifelong Democrats are saying they just can't vote for Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. No flames here. I agree.
An argument could also be made that 9-11 would never have happened.

Gore would have NEVER ognored all the warnings. He would have alerted the airports. Gore's Air Force (for whatever reason) would have scrambled jets out of Andrews instead of sitting idle.

Gore would have NEVER rejected the terrorism report that suggested heightened security at airports and other precautions in 2001.

Why the Busheviks did all these things is open to the interpretive question: Incompetent or treasonous?

But the fact is that many horrible things that have happened would not have happened had President Gore been allowed to take his rightful position.

Of course, the Busheviks probably would have had him Kennedied or Wellstoned for the same reasons they Kennedied Kennedy and Wellstoned Wellstone, so perhaps by giving up the Presidency saved his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's be honest: Dems couldn't lead a boy scout troop
They're so piss-poor that they blame Ralph Nader for all their woes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. american dreamers
so resigned to the inevtiable the misdeeds of the republican party (disenfranshisement, scotus...etc.) as to completly exempt it from the current mess. rest in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. If JFK hadn't been killed....
GW Bush wouldn't be living in the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. If the Dems had bothered to challenge the disenfranchisement
of African-American voters in Florida you could probably make the same hypothetical case. Or that if those Dems did NOT vote for IWR those soldiers (as well as the civilians from Afghanistan and Iraq that you leave out of the human toll) might still be alive.

Since so many Dems voted for IWR and the Patriot Act it is disingenuous to claim it would be so different if the Dems had not had the election stolen by the Republicans.

(Your post indicates that you don't believe the Republicans stole the election--I disagree with you on that.)


I did not vote for Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. QUIT SCAPEGOATING NADER ALREADY!!!
Nader DID NOT cost Gore the election. The more you folks dwell on this, the less likely the real issues that cost Gore the election will ever be fixed! SCOTUS cost Gore the election. Disenfranchised black voters in FL cost Gore the election. Butterfly ballot cards cost Gore the election. LET IT FUCKING GO.. PLEASE. The more you harp on this, the more you alienate the Greens who frequent this board, and want to help rid the nation of Bush.

Question: Did Nader also cost Gore his home state of Tennessee?
Answer: NO!

Spin it all you want, but Gore LOST HIS OWN FUGGIN STATE!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. that's bullshit, they were determined to steal the election
and they did, no matter what nader or gore did, it was us, the american people, that let this all happen when we didn't riot in the streets to stop the theft

it's easy to blame someone else since you don't have to live up to your own failure

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. And, while we're at it...
ANGRYMNDEM--We could also mention that it would have been FAR LESS LIKELY that 9-11 would have happened, or certainly not on such a grand scale. Along with a continued Federal Budget surplus, continued reduction in the National Debt, continued economic prosperity (at the very least a quicker recovery from any recession), etc.

But that's around 600+ of our men and women in uniform who would have still been alive to enjoy the holidays with their loved ones...along with close to 2900 others from Sept 11, 2001, who would've had three more holiday seasons with family and friends under their belts.:cry:

Yes, the world would be a LOT BETTER--not to mention safer--place today if the Scalia Five, with a little help from Jeb Boy and Cruella Deville in Fla., had not been able to hold sway. And had ONE-TENTH of Ralphie Boy's supporters in Florida voted for Al Gore instead--that's right; one-tenth of 30,000 votes is, of course, 3000--we wouldn't even have to think about it, hanging chads or no hanging chads. All we'd be talking about at DU today would be President Gore running for re-election in 2004--and fighting Tom Delay and those nasty Repub dogs in Congress!:eyes:

The next Repub who tries to tell me that Dub is a "uniter, not a divider", I'm going to CLOBBER...with the TRUTH, that is! :mad:

There's a NEW cancer growing on the presidency--and we've got to EXCISE him from it next November 2nd. The survival of this very nation is at stake.

:kick:

B-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. WOW...Nader is the MOST POWERFUL MAN ON EARTH!!!
maybe in the UNIVERSE. Nader cuased the Invasion of Iraq, 911, killed 400 American soldiers, invaded Afghanistan, defeated Al Gore, destroyed the Democratic Party.....man, what a SUPERMAN!!!!!

Is NADER THAT STRONG.... or the Democratic Party that WEAK????

Nader stole NOTHING!. Al Gore and the Democratic Party threw away those votes. They had the poll numbers, they KNEW how many would vote for Nader in Florida, and chose to DISCARD those votes in order to please their Corporate Backers!

Nader is a mere man. His message is POWERFUL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. NOT AS POWERFUL AS ME!!!
Signed,
Clinton's Penis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Grin.
You win, DS1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ajacobson Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Pure flame bait
But lets face it, there are scads of people who are just FIXATED on 2000 and will not let a moment pass without dwelling on it.

What in the hell do you think you can do about it now? OTHER THAN WHINING? Please illuminate the purpose of this to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. don't see naders name on the IWR
but i saw 2 presidential candidates proudly standing with the chimp in the rose garden that couldn't wait to hand over the ability to invade irag to a moron and his henchmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bambo53 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. How about this...
What if Nader had won? What would the world, or at least our little part of it, look like today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. get over it!
get over it? NEVER!!

you are dead on right.

Nader is a neocon accomplice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. I despise Nader
I despised him before 2000, but his actions increased my hatred. I've never seen him as a progressive. When I worked for a Nader organization, he tried to stop us from and feminist actions and environmental actions. He did not treat his staff well. I have seen him as an egomaniac and not a true progressive ever since.

I understand the greens frustration. Much contributed to Chimp holding office. The disenfrachisement of African-American voters and the lack of the Democrats for speaking out. The BBV, and not counting the votes. I hold the Democratic party responsible for much of this but I also hold Nader and his campaigning in close states, too.

I support Greens for local elections. I will help build a party from the grassroots, but I refuse to support a national candidate. It just seems like an attempt to create a progressive party from the top down instead of from the base. I never understood why Greens supported Nader. He has never been a great environmentalist. On a national scale, they only act as spoilers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. don't see naders name on the IWR
but i saw 2 democratic presidential candidates proudly standing with the chimp in the rose garden that couldn't wait to hand over the ability to invade iraq to a moron and his henchmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. You are so right and all the BS from the Nadarights
will not change that. 96,000 people in Florida voted for Gore. If 1/3 of the Nadar ppl did not vote, then who would the others voted for Bush or Gore.

Nadar has alway hated the Democratic party and has done everything he could to kill it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. "Nadar has alway hated the Democratic party "
have any proof of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. dream on, it's easier than living in reality

they stole that election outright
and they planned on it


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. If Nader has sat out 2000...
Jeb and Katherine would still have purged 57,500 names from the FL voting registry, some blacks would still have been prevented from reaching the FL voting booths, voting machines would still have been rigged, but most important of all...

SCOTUS WOULD STILL HAVE APPOINTED WHISTELASS!

Are you really that naive as to what the repugs have been doing for the past three decades? Everyone of you that blame Nader are showing true ignorance about the last thirty years of our country's political history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm still waiting...
...for one of the "Nader-Haters" to start a thread to discuss the 2000 election from a more truthful aspect.

- We can probably agree on one thing: Bush* is the most corrupt president* in American history. His side has control of the media and all the major corporations have contributed more money to his campaign than any other in 200 years. He sneers at the Constitution and is untouchable by the laws of the land. He can lie, cheat and steal and get away with it.

- And yet...some have nothing better to discuss than Nader. How does this help Democrats in 2004? The answer is that it doesn't help them...and only serves to alienate those trying to find a reason to vote Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. Locking.
The moderators have discussed this thread and we feel that it is inflammatory. I'm going to lock this now.

Thanks,
Jono
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC