my e-mail today to Neal Boortz

[ima_sinnic]

I got so p-o'ed today when I heard some of the lies and dumb shit he said, I couldn't restrain myself from calling him a few names--immature, I know. But I really do think it is important that we keep reminding the media, the pundits, and the legislators that it goes far beyond "the 16 words" and also is not about to die down just because Q&U got offed.

To: [email protected]
Subject: so-called liberals are NOT "upset"

Caught part of your show this morning while running errands in the car. Neal, the idea that the death of Saddam's sons is somehow "disappointing" or "upsetting" to "liberals" couldn't be further from the truth. You might scour the Democratic Underground forums from yesterday onward to find even a tiny bit of evidence to back up your latest absurd remarks. Those smart enough to see through the fraud of BushCo's little war (obviously you and your brainless fans were not blessed with that kind of intellect)--waged solely for corporate profits--feel that even if Saddam himself were killed it does nothing to negate the fact that Bush and his puppet masters (particularly Rumsfeld and Cheney, running a private war through the Naziesque "Office of Special Plans") deceived the American people into going into an irrelevant war--they have in fact weakened the military capability of the U.S. so now we can't adequately respond to North Korea. Just because brutal thugs are dead Bush and his PNAC pals are not now relieved of accountability for their numerous lies, coverups, and deceptions meant to mask why we REALLY went to war.

The killing of Saddam's sons does absolutely nothing to address the "20 Lies About the War" published in a recent issue of the Independent:

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=424008.

It does nothing to address Howard Dean's "16 Questions for the President," which were derived from those 20 lies:

http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer

Laugh all you want at Howard Dean, moron--notice the "Republicans for Dean" weblog:

http://republicansfordean.blogspot.com/
"Left wing, liberal "peacenik"? Hardly, Howard Dean's
stated time and again that he's no pacifist. His
opposition to the Iraq war is deep seated and well
founded. George Bush and possibly Tony Blair led
their two countries down the garden path. We've had not
one iota of evidence of weapons of mass destruction
or support of Al-Queda. We're now stuck in a Vietnam
like quagmire with not only no end in sight and clamor
for additional troops. LBJ and Mc Namara? Nope,
this time is Bush and Rumsfeld. Howard Dean's the
only viable candidate that spoke out from the start on
Bush's obsession with Saddam and Iraq"

They are also for Dean because of his fiscal conservativism--something I guess a phony so-called Libertarian like yourself knows nothing about. You like to ridicule the "Democrats" for spending big--take a look at what your incompetent SOB "leader" has done and try to figure out who's REALLY into big spending--and for what?? You really think that ill-advised invasion of Iraq is making us safe from terrorism?? what a fool!

I see the Taliban is re-energized and killing Americans in Afghanistan--I suppose you were stupid enough to think that that place was "mission accomplished" also, dumbass.

The killing of Saddam's sons will do nothing to boost flagging troop morale, bitterness and outrage on the part of their families, and steadily increasing attacks on our troops. Hey dumbass: we invaded their country and are occupying it--what would YOU do? Iraqis are no different than Americans, Neal, they want sovereignty.

Just to prove you are a total know-nothing: the other day I heard you tell a caller that Bush could not be impeached for lying "because he wasn't under oath." Funny, those who DO know what they are talking about say that making false statements to Congress is a CRIME--why not read what John Dean, former counsel to Richard Nixon has to say:

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030718.html

Join right in with the rest of the desperate windbags who are trying to deflect criticism from their serial liar hero by focusing on Kobe Bryant. That kind of empty-minded non-news suits you--an empty-minded, reactionary, lying asshole--to a T. The case against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, Wolfowitz, Perle, and the rest of the jackals is not about to go away because of dumb-shit stories like that--nice try, desperado.

Someone a lot smarter than you,