Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: Jim March & Diebold In Yahoo!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:37 PM
Original message
BBV: Jim March & Diebold In Yahoo!
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/031028/480/sc10110280507

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031028/ap_on_hi_te/electronic_voting_leaks_2


SAN JOSE, Calif. - Despite lawsuit threats from one of the nation's largest electronic voting machine suppliers, some activists are refusing to remove from Web sites internal company documents that they claim raise serious security questions.


Diebold Inc. sent "cease and desist" letters after the documents and internal e-mails, allegedly stolen by a hacker, were distributed on the Internet. Recipients of the letters included computer programmers, students at colleges including Swarthmore and at least one Internet provider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is Rachel Konrad's latest... if you search on Google it is EVERYWHERE
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=rachel+konrad+diebold&sa=N&tab=wn

Konrad is doing a brilliant job on this.... it is interesting that Associated Press is the only wire agency on this. They have been on it since the begginning - firstly with some reporters in Baltimore. Plus of course they were the only ones who did not screw up on election night 2000...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. "It's proprietary information ...
how we plan to fix the 2004 election."

Unfortunately, the news stories do not provide links to any of the websites that post the documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So many ways to fix an election...
That's a "feature" of these BBV machines.

And on some of them you can easily fit entire ballot boxes in your pocket or up your sleeve!

This is a kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. be sure to RATE THE STORY
for what it's worth

:toast: to the BBV crew!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Still #2 AP Tech Story
4.23 with (only) 292 votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rate the Story
Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adjoran Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-28-03 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. I sure hope these guys have retained private counsel
From the AP:

"Wendy Seltzer, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said she has been contacted by about a dozen groups that received cease-and-desist letters. Among them is Online Policy Group, a nonprofit ISP that hosts the San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center, which published links to the data.

Seltzer encouraged them to defy the Diebold cease-and-desist letters.

"There is a strong fair-use defense," Seltzer said. "People are using these documents to talk about the very mechanism of democracy - how the votes are counted. It's at the heart of what the First Amendment protects."

Although Seltzer believes Diebold's legal case to be weak, she worries about a chilling effect."


While Seltzer may be correct about a fair-use defense for those discussing the papers, what she doesn't mention is that, if the documents were obtained illegally, Diebold will be able to subpoena all computer records of those involved well before any trial. This amounts to free combination fishing expedition/anal exam for Diebold to use against a lot of people.

No matter how just the cause, it is dangerous to place your personal liberty and property in the hands of an attorney who has another agenda. The EFF does some great work in fighting for internet freedom, but anyone threatened with legal action is best advised to retain their own counsel, whose only interest is in their protection, not some greater goal - no matter how laudable that goal may be.

That caution noted, it will be very interesting to see what is in those files!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Diebold will be able to subpoena all computer records..."
That's quite an amusing thought, actually.

But oh dear, Adjoran... does mean you yourself will be looking at those "interesting" Diebold files?

Accckkkkkkk! You are tainted! You'd better hire private counsel, and prepare for your Diebold "anal exam."

BTW, all my computer records are stored on systems I found in the dumpsters behind Yoyodyne Populsion Systems, just after they folded.

It's only fair that I give Diebold's lawyers (and their so-called computer experts) a chance to brush up on the care and feeding of glowing green slime memory units. We call them GloG-SMUs for short.

What's that watermelon doing there? Could it be yet another form of computer record? You never know. Better carry that out to the truck too, guys...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC