Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Senate Roll-Call Vote on "Partial-Birth Abortion"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:13 AM
Original message
The Senate Roll-Call Vote on "Partial-Birth Abortion"
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 09:14 AM by Atlant
Here's the list of who voted which way, grouped by Vote and Party:

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00402

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 108th Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On the Conference Report (S. 3 Conference Report )
Vote Number: 402 Vote Date: October 21, 2003, 05:09 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Conference Report Agreed to
Measure Number: S. 3 (Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 )
Measure Title: A bill to prohibit the procedure commonly known as partial-birth abortion.

Vote Counts: YEAs 64
NAYs 34
Not Voting 2


Grouped By Vote Position

YEAs ---64


Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Campbell (R-CO)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nickles (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reid (D-NV)

NAYs ---34


Chafee (R-RI)
Collins (R-ME)
Snowe (R-ME)

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (D-FL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 2


Hutchison (R-TX)

Edwards (D-NC)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the spineless Dems had voted Nay this wouldn't have passed
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 09:23 AM by truebrit71
Senators Biden, Byrd, Leahy, Daschle et al you should be ashamed of yourselves for falling for this attack on a woman's right to choose....

This whole debate was framed from the very beginning by the zealots and there wasn't a Dem out there with the stones to take it back and put it in perspective.....

I am FURIOUS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. but Byrd is God here on DU
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 09:28 AM by NewYorkerfromMass
glad to see Kerry sticking to his guns and voting his conscience as usual.

Oh and Lieberman haters should get a grip and see the man is a good liberal too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Could it be that they think differently?
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 03:28 PM by jiacinto
Maybe they actually disagree with you. Did that ever occur to you?

Now, as for Byrd and Daschle, should they put the wishes of a small minority of extreme left wing activists ahead of their own constituents who elected them?

They both represent states that are conservative on issues like abortion. Do you expect them to vote against their constituents to please you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. But what about the gun manufacturer's liability bill?
Does Daschle support the bill limiting liability for gun manufacturers because of his constituents too?

I've heard it 'limits' liability and I've heard it eliminates it entirely, not sure which is fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Baloney, jiacinto
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 03:41 PM by Woodstock
did it ever occur to YOU that they didn't agree? and neither did their constituents?

and did it ever occur to you that some of the Republicans who voted for it didn't agree either, they just played the game to win?

polls consistently show 60% of Americans are OK with Roe v. Wade/support abortion rights if the question is put simply and not worded with Republican rhetoric - and this bill was the first step at undoing it - and earth to you, West Virginians are NOT conservative

this was called the "give the bully the lunch money and maybe he'll leave us alone" strategy the so-called Democratic "leadership" has been employing all along - they've lost their chance at the House, the Senate, and now likely the Presidency by playing the game this way

Senator Mouse AKA Senate Minority "Leader" and the others could have shown LEADERSHIP and exposed this for the the religious right vote grab it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. And of course then voted against the people who elected him
That's not a wise prescription if one wants to stay in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I just said the people supported abortion rights
so why would he be "voting against" them if he voted against a bill that doesn't protect the health of a woman?

if he perceives that is what they wanted, then it's a failure on HIS part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Yes Carlos, They Should !!! --- It's Called LEADERSHIP !!!
"Do you expect them to vote against their constituents to please you?"

Not to please me. But to go to their constituents, through townhall meetings, political ads, etc., and reframe the debate so his state's voters are BETTER INFORMED! It would have been the right and courageous thing to do. We have a representative republic where the voters trust their representatives to better informed than most of them, and to do what is in their best interest. He was elected to do right by the people of his state. In that respect, he has utterly failed, and the political consequencs were already paid out in 2002. We already lost the Senate, remember.

Maybe when we see some of our Dems actually take right and courageous stands against the fundamentalist facists, we might encourage others, and might actually win a few election along the friggin way!!!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. and also, quite a few people supported the Iraq war who no longer do
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 03:47 PM by Woodstock
support for the war has dropped significantly since they learned about the lies - and that was just a few months later

similarly support for Bush dropped once they learned about his lies

funny how, when the propaganda falls away, and the truth emerges, perceptions change

Senator Tommy Mouse did a lousy job - admit it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. What do you expect
when even people on this board are willing to use THEIR terminology.

YOU helped this happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Excuse me, but I "quoted" someone
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 11:18 AM by Atlant
> What do you expect when even people on this board are willing to use THEIR terminology.
>
> YOU helped this happen.

I believe you must have missed the quotation-marks in the
title of my thread. And the rest of the language in my thread
was taken from the Senate's Web Page.

Please don't blame this abomination on me; I send my political
donation to Planned Parenthood every year as well as supporting
the local battered-women's shelter AND a home for discarded
kids!

The people to blame for this are all the folks who thought that
Bush wouldn't actually do the things we all knew he would.

Atlant


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Edwards showed a lot of balls by not voting...
what a freaking joke....you're running for president and you cant take a stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red_Storm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Both Senators from my state voted against it ....good,,,, but....

Look at all the Dem's that voted for it....not good.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. "balls" is right, easy for a fucking man to vote against abortion rights
when the sonofabitches are not the ones that get pregnant!

Fuck Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Actually, don't fuck him.
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 11:16 AM by Atlant
> Fuck Edwards!

Actually, don't fuck him. He might leave you pregnant with
no options.

(Women could end this issue in about ten days if all women
refused to fuck ANY man who didn't stand four-square
behind women's reproductive rights.)

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. :-)
There are lot of good ones here, but unfortunately, we've spent way too much time these past few days arguing with guys who just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Thanks!
> There are lot of good ones here, but unfortunately, we've spent way
> too much time these past few days arguing with guys who just don't get it.

Yeah, but if they never "got it" any more, then they might eventually "get it". :-)

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think he may have lost a lot of votes in NH, Iowa,
but not sure what it means for SC now.

BTW Look at Lieberman voting against! I hope that's enough to quiet the 'Holy Joe' brigade here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Religious challenge?
Look at Lieberman voting against! I hope that's enough to quiet the 'Holy Joe' brigade here at DU.

According to Jewish law, life begins when the crown of the head presents in the birth canal. Lieberman is voting his conscience as informed by his religious beliefs.

Jewish law would sometimes encourage a woman to abort a pregnancy because Jewish law gives precedence to a woman's existing life over the potential life of any fetus, no matter how far along. A rabbi would be able to explain the details, but this late-term abortion ban could be challenged as government interference with religious practice I would think.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm

http://www.jlaw.com/Briefs/casey4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Good for him - I will ease up
but I still disagree with his Iraq/fiscal policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
40. Edwards
Edwards has some good rhetoric, but he's proven time and time again in his short stint in the senate that he votes (or abstains) for political expediency: IWR, Patriot Act, Off-Shore oil exploration of his home state, Abortion.

He'd learn a lot serving as VP under someone with some backbone, but that's the best he's qualified for at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Both my senators are in the "nay" column!
Go Kohl & Feingold! (I met them both this week. Good guys.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Hey, good to see you here
Where did you meet our Senators?

I used to see Kohl at Ma Fischers all the time on the East Side...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think this will be overturned.
Hopefully once this is overturned (if it is), then they can add a health exception which would indeed cover all cases in which these procedures are carried out. Then the law would be meaningless.

I wonder after the whole "partial birth" issue fades what the anti-abortion rights people will move on to. I also predict that support for abortion rights will rise a bit before long as some recognize "hey, these people are serious. They don't just OPPOSE abortion, they want to throw people in prison!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. that's our job, since the DNC wants to cede the game
by giving away a little here, a little there, until there is nothing left

we can't count on the corporate media to educate them

we sure as hell can't count on Senator Tommy Mouse

Ted Kennedy and Howard Dean and Diane Feinstein and the other strong true Dems will help, but we need to get the word out, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Glad to see my guys
voted "NO"-Corzine and Lautenberg. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Interesting about Chafee, Snowe, and Collins
The moderate pubs are supposed to be mainly about fiscal responsibility, didn't know it carried into social/ideological issues.
I am writing letters to all 3. This charade has go to stop.
They have got to stop associating with the modern day, Hatch/Frist lead evil GOP. I don't care if they just go Ind. like Jeffords, this tacit support of Bush by remaining Repubs has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just another political vote folks (like IWR)
nothing to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. why,oh why,oh why
do I have to kick this? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks Barbara Mikulski! Thanks Paul Sarbanes!
I'm glad I'm from Maryland.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Can't believe Pat Leahy though
New England's rebel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. they are Democrats
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 03:56 PM by Woodstock
through and through

made a mistake on Iraq

but that's rare for them

you can count on them to support the platform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Should Daschle vote against his constituents
Do you honestly think that Daschle is going to vote against the constituents who elected him? Maybe he comes from a conservative state, where people may disagree with you all here. Should he put the wishes of a small minority of extreme left wing activists ahead of the constituents who elected him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. see my answer above to your bogus question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Why is it bogus
Wasn't Daschle elected to serve the people of South Dakota? Or was he elected to serve the people at DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Lieberman haters, take notice
He voted no on this bill. But I fully expect you all to claim that he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. And You'd Be Wrong Again !!! --- I Truly Appreciate Lieberman's Vote Here
Do I want him as my President???

OH HELL NO!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I am not voting for him either
I just know that some poitn down the line the Lieberman haters are going to claim that he supported this bill when he didn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. Both my senators voted No
Graham and Nelson from FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
39. Does anyone have any insight into why Patrick Leahy voted as he did?
I mean, with the exception of Leahy and our two numb-nuts
from New Hampshire, ALL of New England (including
three Republicans!), NY, and NJ voted against this PoS.

So why did Leahy (normally a pretty reliable Democrat) vote
"Yes"?

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC