AOL Poll on Pres. Clinton's place in history

[biscotti]

Is it too soon to come to historical conclusions about Clinton's presidency?
No 60%
Yes 40%

How important are the details about Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky?
Very important 44%
Not necessary to mention 30%
Not that important 27%
Total Votes: 62,537

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20051227031109990002&ncid=NWS00010000000001

[William769]

1. Done.

Is it too soon to come to historical conclusions about Clinton's presidency?
No 60%
Yes 40%
How important are the details about Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky?
Very important 44%
Not necessary to mention 30%
Not that important 27%
Total Votes: 64,465

[Pam-Moby]

2. Done

Is it too soon to come to historical conclusions about Clinton's presidency?
No 60%
Yes 40%
How important are the details about Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky?
Very important 44%
Not necessary to mention 30%
Not that important 27%
Total Votes: 65,550
Note on Poll Results

[unblock]

3. i voted "not necessary to mention", but a more full answer

would be that it IS necessary to mention it, but not as a statement about clinton's presidency, but rather as a statement about the congress that he had to deal with.

[babylonsister]

4. Why do they have to drag Clenis out? ISn't there enough

stuff out there to concentrate on, like this (mal)administration?:grr:

[Whoa_Nelly]

5. More Distract and Detract

Can't have the media looking too closely at BushCo while they're busy fucking themselves.

[Greyhound]

7. BushCo itself is just another distraction. n/t

[Lex]

6. 57% believe it's not important or not necessary to mention VS. 44%

who think it's very important (we call those people "crotch sniffers")

[Maestro]

8. Done! -eom

[Nicole]

9. Done

[Vidar]

10. done