Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exactly how long did the NYT hold the spy story? A year and... 2 months?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:58 PM
Original message
Exactly how long did the NYT hold the spy story? A year and... 2 months?
All I keep seeing in the media is "more than a year". So, did the NYT stop this amazing story voluntarily because they were asked to by one of the candidates during the last Presidential election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I asked the NYT when I gave them hell Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is pretty damn big if so.
That means that they were spewing the swiftboat and flip-flop stuff while stopping a story about Bush deliberately breaking the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I asked this exact same question in another thread not more than a
2 minutes ago.

I really want an answer as to when EXACTLY the NYT got this information and I really want an explanation from them as to why they held it for more than a year.

After the Miller fiasco I wouldn't put anything past those bastards and I am pissed off as all hell about this.


:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. IF they had the story before the election, we will never know.
They're already in deep shit because they held the story. If they had it before the election???? OMG. They would be finished. I already see the Times as a rag..... No better than the National Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC