|
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:45 PM by JWS
I don't know how serious I am about this idea, but who knows?
The United States should have an all volunteer army for defensive purposes, and for light policing efforts, but for the nation-building that the Neo-cons envision, Congress should pass a bill saying that a large scale draft necessarily accompany any large military action. This would make it sufficiently difficult for politicians such as Bushco to start a war to get his polls up, and make the U.S. population sufficiently interested to demand hearings on the war's progress, to demand responsibility for false intelligence, and demand reasonable timetables for the war's end.
Additionally, a mandatory draft accompanying any large military action would spread the hardship so that it is not predominantly lower income households who have soldiers going to war. This would do more than prevent unnecessary wars, it would mobilize families to make sure that soldiers are getting the equipment that they need. Many politicians (John Murtha, John Kerry, and Wes. Clark included) believe that the job of securing Iraq could have been done very early on if sufficient troops and resources were committed.
The mandatory war tax should be geared toward the Military Industrial complex who benefit from any war. It should make it so that Halliburton etc. aren't so greatly rewarded by the country engaging in war, (but not necessarily hurt by a nonformal declaration of war either).
I may be way off base with this one, and wouldn't be surprised if I change my mind about this upon hearing compelling arguments or information to the contrary, but as someone who is worried about unnecessary wars, AND jus cogens violations, this doesn't seem such a bad idea.
|