Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald's "Official A's" in other court filings USUALLY got indicted.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:22 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald's "Official A's" in other court filings USUALLY got indicted.
Snip>

But Mr Fitzgerald’s record as attorney in Chicago – when he has cited “Official A” in other court filings – is ominous. Official As usually get indicted.

Snip>

A former federal prosecutor said: “That suggests that A was within the scope of the investigation and that the grand jury found probable cause to believe the official did what the indictment says. Whether that official will be indicted, there is no way to tell. One reason not to identify them is that you do not wish to injure his reputation when there is little chance of indictment, or you want to disguise the progress of your investigation.”

Mr Fitzgerald’s record points to the latter. The best example concerns George Ryan, the former governor of Illinois. In May 2002 an indictment referred to a mysterious “Official A”, charged with authorising kickbacks in return for a share. Mr Ryan denied he was the official. “I don’t believe I am. I sure as hell don’t think I am.” Fast- forward three years and Mr Ryan has been not only unmasked as Official A but in September went on trial on 22 counts of corruption.

Another complaint, in October 2004, referred to “Water Department Official A”, who ran a hired truck kickback scheme, a scandal that rocked Chicago. The man was later identified as Donald Tomczak. In July he pleaded guilty to accepting $400,000 in cash.

More at:


http://news.ft.com/cms/s/76211ef8-4cb0-11da-89df-0000779e2340.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rove the 'Official A-hole' hopefully will be indicted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I think he will eventually
I think Fitzgerald is using him as others too have said. More than likely to figure out what all happened and who all was involved. Why, who, when, where. All those "w" question's. Rove probably thinks he can still get away if he complies but I agree that he's probably official A. Everything that goes on there goes on because of Bush and because of Iraq and their corporate friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sort of like an Ensign in a Star Trek episode
They're always doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. or a girlfriend on Starsky & Hutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I never noticed that....
But then I didn't watch S&H very much. I was more into Baretta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent.
Let's hope Rove gets frog-marched in due time.:applause:

Someone ought to e-mail this good news to the WH. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yup
Just yup. Turdblossom is still in very serious legal jeapordy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Karl Rove looks very "Official A" to me.
"Offical A-Hole" that is. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hoot!
Rove, you are so screwed! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Usually doesn't mean definitely.
But I'm keeping my phalanges crossed.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. It would have to be the latter of these two:
One reason not to identify them is that you do not wish to injure his reputation when there is little chance of indictment, or you want to disguise the progress of your investigation.”

It seems it would have to be the latter because everyone on earth knows Rove is the "official A-Hole".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Good point
Hmm. Makes you wonder now who official A is. I think Rove is definietly too suspecious and too obvious. Maybe official A is Cheney or maybe even Bush for all we know. I still think Rove will probably get something though if he's lied to the jury and Fitzgerald has enough proof that he was involved someway. Fitzgerald could be going into the opposite direction than what people think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. So say Rove is indicted and his indictment also names an Official A
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 09:27 PM by hootinholler
Would that be the same official or a different one?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. -snip-
Fast- forward three years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC