Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grand Jury #1 Investigated Plame, What Will Grand Jury #2 Investigate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:59 PM
Original message
Grand Jury #1 Investigated Plame, What Will Grand Jury #2 Investigate?
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 09:46 PM by Beetwasher
Assuming there will be a GJ #2 or a continuation of the 1st GJ. I say they will investigate about lying to congress and use of illegal propoganda to start an unjustified war as part of a new GJ's mandate or a widening of the original mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not just that, but how ong will it take them to get all caught up on the d
GJ #1 knows so well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Have A Feeling GJ #2 Might Be A Bit Quicker
Remember how Earle got a new GJ and a new indictment within days? Not saying the same thing will happen, or that it will be that quick, but it coulde be quicker. Fitz already has a lot of the evidence collected and a preliminary report ready that would consolidate it and set the narrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you got it.....
1. the forged documents about the yellow cake
2. lying to congress
3. manipulation of the media @ taxpayers expense
gannon
armstrong williams
whoever else was on the white house payroll
4. Dreaming here ..... election fraud ..... i bet you rove or another
person will sing like a birdy
5. abuse of power
6. Treason



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe Something Like A Conspiracy To Disseminate Illegal Propoganda
and deceive Congress and the American People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Now That We Have The NYT Article
and it seems the GJ might continue, speculate away on 1. will it be a continuation of the current GJ as is or 2. continuation of the same GJ w/ a modified mandate or 3. A new GJ w/ a new mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The NYT article doesn't mean shit...
They should name their sources. Shame on them.
Associates close to Libby. Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I Agree
I don't trust them, just speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why would there be a second Grand Jury in this case?
Fitzgerald can recall this same grand jury for up to three years, if I recall correctly.

They've only been recalled once, so that makes their term so far 1 year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I've Read Different Things In Different Places
It seems it's not clear, at least to me, that's why I'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I had heard that he'd have to enpanel a new one
because this one had already been extended once
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yup, I've Read Conflicting Accounts
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. WaPo had that, among other media. That's correct for regular Fed grand
juries, but not true of special Fed grand juries such as the Plame investigation grand jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I think this grand jury's had its 18 mo term + one 6 mo extension.
Special federal grand juries sit for 18 months and can be extended in 6 month increments for another 18 months. Total max possible term 36 months.

This grand jury was empaneled not long after Fitz took over the investigation, if I understand correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh I sure hope you are right....
But after two frigging years you would think that Fritz has already investigated at least parts of that. It's all related so its had to come up.

Maybe we will get a surprise tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe nothing more than staged indictments?
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 11:34 PM by Gregorian
Working the criminals for more confessions?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC