Folks...we hit the trifecta.

[lateo]

We already knew the Scooter Libby and Cheney were more than likely involved in the Plame leak and now it looks like Bush just might be too...

TRIFECTA!

[Ladyhawk]

1. So far only rumors of rumors, but at least they're "mainstream" rumors. :D

:silly:

[shaggy1974]

2. No trifecta yet

There's just as good of a chance that there won't be indictments. I hope I'm wrong, but it's quite possible that Fitzgerald doesn't have enough for criminal indictments...and if he doesn't it doesn't just mean that he's in the pocket of Bushco.

[stepnw1f]

4. No There Isn't (nt)

[DoYouEverWonder]

11. Wishful thinking?

You don't get a panel of judges to agree to send a Pulizer prize winning journalist to jail unless you've got a case.

It not a matter of if there will be indictments, it's just how many and when.

[snippy]

12. Read Judge Tatel's opinion in the Cooper/Miller case.

Fitzgerald's evidence seems to have convinced Judge Tatel that crimes were committed.

[hang a left]

16. people that make these kind of statements

haven't been following this story. Did you forget about the statements made by the judge before remanding Miller to jail?

[greatauntoftriplets]

3. Got a link to that???

Please.

[deadparrot]

5. here you go...

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/02/bush-directly-involved/

[greatauntoftriplets]

10. Thanks.

I hadn't heard.

[mcctatas]

6. If there is any justice in this world, these thugs will finally have to

practice some of that "personal accountability" they're always harping about (usually as a reason to cut social programs or otherwise screw the poor and middle-class), don't let lurkers and freepers get ya down, just toss them a scooby snack;)

[henslee]

7. It just as good if he is the last man standing.

[applegrove]

8. No. Saying Bush was involved is meant to make it look good when

fitz just comes out with a report slamming the WH or with a few indictments for aides.

Freepers will be so happy - they will give Bush a big blue sticky star for not being a felon.

I'm guessing of course. Don't think there has been one leak from Fitz office - so why all of sudden?

I don't buy it.

Let's just wait for the facts written down on paper & filed with the courts.

[hang a left]

17. No leaks out of Fitz's camp..

so we have to assume it is from people who have testified or who know who testified to what.

[applegrove]

19. Assume is right. I would bet it isn't true.

[hang a left]

20. You could be right...you could be wrong

I was just stating the obvious source, from my perspective, of the leak. Could be disinfo. We shouldn't have too much longer to wait to find out.

[applegrove]

21. Yup - as I've always said - we don't know until we know. We are not

witness. We have to rely on primary info of others.

[henslee]

9. What is a realistic time frame for stuff to get rolling?

[snippy]

13. The term of the grand jury expires October 28.

So some of the criminals in the Bush administration should have their orange jumpsuits in time for Halloween.

[DesertRat]

14. Welcome President Hastert?

:puke:

[snippy]

15. Bush would never resign.

And there is no crime for which a republican controlled House would impeach him. No crime whatsoever.

[rodeodance]

18. nope-not yet.