Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Economic question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:41 PM
Original message
Economic question
Why is it that when they report on monthly economic numbers, they say "excluding food and energy costs, the economy grew by .5 percent last quarter."

Well, no shit. If you cut out food and energy costs from my budget, I'd be making money hand over fist. Hell, let's throw out my student loans, too, and I'll be a gazillionaire before you know it.

Is there a legitimate reason that they omit these economy-stiffling numbers from the reporting, or is it just to make the forecast look less dismal?


PARENTHETICAL NOTE: The President can't control the economy unless he's a Republican and the economy is strong or he's a Democrat and the economy is weak. Then it's entirely the result of the President's actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Believe There Are Two Measures Of Inflation
One that excludes food and energy and one that doesn't...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It Looks Like This
%ÄPt= (Pt - Pt-1)/Pt-1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hey, that looks like math
Can't you draw me a picture, instead?

Actually, I know that there are two indicators, but I seldom hear the food/energy-inclusive figure listed first (or at all, sometimes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes
it is to make the forecast look less dismal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. xactly
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. anything coming out of a government agency is wildly distorted
Unemployment numbers is a very good example of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I belive you are looking at INFLATION measures
which sometimes exclude food and energy, mostly because they tend to be really volatile.

You end up with the "core inflation rate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hey, I think that you're right
I couldn't remember which figures they were, exactly, but I knew that they bug me every time I hear them.

Thanks for the clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. historically, food and energy prices are more volatile
and therefore, month-to-month changes are not very useful for identifying trends.

the idea is that if you include food and energy prices in the monthly inflation numbers, you might get a sharp increase when there's no real inflation, just because food prices happened to jump up this month. or, you might show no a small number when there really is inflation just because the energy prices happened to drop.

in short, there's a lot of "noise" in the monthly movements of food and energy prices; other things show much more stable trends.


of course, the obvious problem then, is what if all the inflation really is in food and energy prices? well, the hope is simply that if the inflation is real, it will eventually be reflected in other things, which will be caught by the inflation statistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Food and Energy fluctuate seasonally. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC