Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration Wins Appeal on Padilla

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:10 PM
Original message
Bush Administration Wins Appeal on Padilla

Friday September 9, 2005 8:46 PM


AP Photo NY116

By KRISTEN GELINEAU

Associated Press Writer

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - In a victory for the Bush administration, a federal appeals court ruled Friday that the government can continue to hold indefinitely an American accused of plotting to detonate a radioactive ``dirty bomb.''

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously to reverse a judge's order that the government either charge or free Jose Padilla, who has been in custody for more than three years.

``The exceedingly important question before us is whether the President of the United States possesses the authority to detain militarily a citizen of this country who is closely associated with al-Qaida, an entity with which the United States is at war,'' Judge J. Michael Luttig wrote. ``We conclude that the President does possess such authority.''

A federal judge in South Carolina ruled in February that the government cannot hold Padilla indefinitely as an ``enemy combatant,'' a designation President Bush gave him in 2002. The government views Padilla as a militant who planned attacks on the United States.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5267266,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. A slippery slope
What would keep Bush from calling anyone he wanted an "enemy combatant" and have them locked up, never to be heard from again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. The boy who
would be king. Same name, same power as a previous ruler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a moronic ruling. You can't be "at war" with something like AQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC