|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 12:48 PM Original message |
We need "them" to answer questions under oath. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catfight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Very ironic bush is afraid of telling the truth under oath. It's amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Get out the bible, ask him to raise his right hand and start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Is It Fascism Yet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. What you think Shrub would hesitate to lie? He does it so much he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, he would lie under oath. If we impeach for lying about a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Is It Fascism Yet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 02:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Never mind lying under oath, we impeach for treason too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. of course (with no ear piece) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. Gee, we all know what the RW would have said if Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. We need "star" Democrats, ON TV saying that everyday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 02:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. We need the Dems to demand statements and questioning under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. And you think they wouldn't lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Good. That is the point. Lying under oath is impeachable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 02:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Let them lie. We will catch them. You know Shrub isn't smart enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC