Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List Reasons Why Freepers Hate the name "Chickenhawk"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:24 PM
Original message
List Reasons Why Freepers Hate the name "Chickenhawk"
Mine: Its cuts to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly
The truth hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because once upon a time
(and perhaps even now) chickenhawk referred to a pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:26 PM
Original message
Is That True? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes.
See #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. The old definition refers to men who sexually prey on boys.
Not that long ago, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's Always About Sex with Them
Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. That's not strictly true.
When I was younger, a chicken hawk was a gay man with a taste for younger men, not necessarily under-age. And it was more a type than an age group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Point taken
It's more of a generational thing - I stand corrected. Thanks RoBear. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because they resemble that remark. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. If the shoe fits, wear it!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I like "pussyhawk" better. =)
It really tears at the foundation of their self-constructed macho wacho image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krupskaya Donating Member (689 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Why uphold that macho image...
...by using female imagery as an insult?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Snort
Female imagery? How about balls... somehow it just has a different meaning for most folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because they hate mirrors?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, they all think they're so macho, and calling someone
a chicken anything sounds like you're calling them "yellow"!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pork. The other white meat.
"I dont eat no gull dern chicken you commie freedom hatin basterd! I eat 4 pounds a pork a day and my ticker is fine!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because they can't argue with it...
and they have been trying, plenty.

http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry200508260811.asp

The bottom line is at some point you either walk it like you talk it, or you
lose all credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Nice game of republican twister logic.
Lowery is the biggest chicken-hawk of them all.

This is the same sort of logic he used to back out of a fist-fight challenge from Al Franken. It was almost as bad as "I'd kick your ass but , you see, I have my school clothes on".



http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry082200.shtml


"What would Gary Cooper — as good an approximation of the gentlemanly ideal as any — do? When challenged to a unnecessary fight, his instinct would always be to walk away."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. ooooh...touchy, touchy...
methinks he got his feathers ruffled :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ultimate Fweep in Ridicule
Reminds me of Foghorn Leghorn's
lil fweepie chickenhawk pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gatchaman Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Why do they hate it? The truth hurts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. I call them "fucking cowards" to their faces.
Crude? Sure. True? Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. I Like Your Style (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because it can accurately be applied ...
to damn near every one of their heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. #1: The truth hurts.
and they know it. They're starting to have trouble with the lie they're living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. I remember the 20 something Hitler Youth
on Hardball a few weeks back, from the "College Republicans for Maiming and Killing" or some such group. Tweety asked him if he ever thought about signing up, and he dodged the question, so Tweety pressed him on it and he said "Well, I'm fighting already... in the battle for ideas!" Add this clueless, rationalizing loser to a long and esteemed list of cowards screaming for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sounds like ChickenShit. Same same. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. That's the first thing I thought of. "The Truth Hurts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC