Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Blames Gov't for Abu Ghraib Delay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:27 AM
Original message
ACLU Blames Gov't for Abu Ghraib Delay
The Associated Press

New York - The American Civil Liberties Union accused the government Friday of putting another legal roadblock in the way of its bid to allow the public to see photographs and videos stemming from the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal.

The ACLU said sealed documents the government filed Friday in US District Court in Manhattan will be used to argue that dozens of photographs cannot be released because they would result in a safety threat to individuals.

"We obviously express skepticism about the latest move on the government's part to withhold information the public is clearly entitled to," said Amrit Singh, a staff attorney with the ACLU.

The government raised its new challenge to releasing pictures and videos from Abu Ghraib prison on the same day it was supposed to show the exhibits to a judge presiding over the case, the ACLU said.

Sean H. Lane, the government lawyer handling the case, referred questions to Herbert Haddad, a spokesman for US Attorney David Kelley.

Haddad said the government did file papers in the case under seal, and he said he could not discuss their contents for that reason.

Singh said the delay by the government would be challenged in court by the ACLU, which filed a lawsuit in October 2003 seeking information on the treatment of detainees in US custody and the transfer of prisoners to countries known to use torture. The ACLU contends that prisoner abuse is systemic.

Lane has argued that releasing pictures, even in redacted form, would violate Geneva Convention rules on prisoner treatment by subjecting detainees to additional humiliation or embarrassment.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/072305B.shtml

-------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think the judge will led these delay tactics stand?
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 06:31 AM by Quakerfriend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hard to Say on this just now but the ACLU will fight to get this
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 06:36 AM by Jon8503
resolved. Here is some more info on this you can read.

To date, more than 60,000 pages of government documents have been released in response to the ACLU's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The ACLU has been posting these documents online at


www.aclu.org/torturefoia.

The FOIA lawsuit is being handled by Lawrence Lustberg and Megan Lewis of the New Jersey-based law firm Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, P.C.

Other attorneys in the case are Singh, Jameel Jaffer, and Judy Rabinovitz of the ACLU; Arthur N. Eisenberg and Beth Haroules of the NYCLU; and Barbara Olshansky of the Center for Constitutional Rights.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Are there copies? Why does the pentagon get to control who
sees them. If the ACLU has copies couldn't they erase the faces and release them? It is news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I hope this judges rules BushCo in contempt of court
if any of us ever pulled this crap we would have been in jail months ago.

No one is above the law. Especially government officials who have committed treason in multiple ways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. So much for the freedom of press.
I guess, when it comes to this administration's personal security, our freedom's take a back seat. We are becoming more like the old Soviet state everyday.

Since the terrorids hate us for our freedoms, Bushco seems to be doing their best to address it. I wonder if the terrorists like us more now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Next, they will argue that the images/pics are porn...so naturally can't be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. An open Admission that their actions are making us less safe
They say the release of the pictures will make Americans less safe. It ain't the pictures that will make us less safe but the actions by Americans the pictures show that make us less safe. They are admitting that if those pictures are released we will be less safe ie. The Actions of the US Government are making Americans less safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC