Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyer for Publishing Industry: 'There is No Human Right to Read.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:55 PM
Original message
Lawyer for Publishing Industry: 'There is No Human Right to Read.'
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 02:01 PM by ReverendDeuce
This is in regards to the new Harry Potter book and the slip-up in Canada. I urge you all not to buy this book. If you want to cut to the chase or just don't give a hell about this silly book, click right here (spoiler warning). Instead, get on the waiting list at your local library if Potter is your thing. Reading *is* a human right.

British lawyers described the injunction as “unfair and excessive” but added that the reader did not have a right in law to read the book. Korieh Duodu, a media lawyer for David Price Solicitors and Advocates, said: “I have never heard of such a wide-ranging order. One sympathises with the reader from a non-legal point of view, but property rights often trump civil liberties. There is no human right to read.


Here is the original story: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1691805,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Far Right Ideology defends Harry Potter?
After saying it was witchcraft for so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do you think this is a 'cursed book'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReverendDeuce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just a random adjective... because it's just so ubiquitous and annoying...
Edited to pick a better word. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC