Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the latest Repub spin on Bush's falling poll numbers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:59 PM
Original message
Here's the latest Repub spin on Bush's falling poll numbers.
Norah O'Donnell (WSJ and MSNBC White House correspondent) was on Hardball awhile ago, discussing the WSJ poll that shows that Bush's unfavorable numbers are higher (46%) than his favorable numbers (43%, I think).

So here's her spin. People aren't dissatisfied with Bush. They are dissatisfied with everyone in Washington, Republicans and Democrats. Bush's poll numbers don't demonstrate his unpopularity, per se, but the unhappiness that everyone is feeling with all the people in Washington. Look at Democratic poll numbers. They're not that great either. So Bush has done nothing to precipitate these poll numbers...He's catching the backlash of citizen dissatisfaction with all of Washington. If anything, people are blaming Bush for conditions he can't control--loss of blue collar jobs, gasoline prices, etc.

Can y'all believe this? She's basically saying that he's still popular, even though most people in America are dissatisfied with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. How recent are these numbers?
I want to see some polls reflecting his popularity after the bombing in London.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just said "July 2005."
His June 2005 number was 45% dissatisfied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. oops - self delete
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 11:09 PM by Iris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. The poll was taken July 8-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Really, they're just dissatisfied with Clinton
and it's manifesting itself as bad poll numbers for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Damn, you beat me to it!
I would just like to compliment you on the way your mind works!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. yeah. It''s only been, like, 4.5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yea, right. And if it was a Democrat........
...blah, blah, blah.

They can't seem to take the sole blame for anything, can they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. How many viewers does Hardball have now?
A couple hundred thousand at most? And half of those TVs probably belong to people who hate Tweety's guts and are promising to quit watching him like I've now been doing since the last election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, Norah- they hate what Bush has done, and they hate Dems for
not *stopping* him.

They hate you "journalists" for the same reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. She didn't mention Rove, nor Bush's pet WAR in her explanation....
Ridiculous. And completely transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Dems stopping Bush......
hard to do that, when you can't control the sub-committees. Republicans control the agenda and the votes in these committees. If the American people do hold the Democrats in poor regard, I think it's easy to see why-

(1) Their agenda in Congress is non-existant...it's purely reactive to stopping the Republican agenda. Republicans have killed bi-partisanship. The results are bad law that is obviously skewed against the average American.

(2) The media's rationing/control of the Democratic message. We all know that, with the exception of KO and TDS, the "serious" political shows are dominated and controlled by Republicans. They systematically underrepresent progressive/alternative viewpoints. They pick our most conservative Democrats (Biden and Lieberman) as the designated Democrats to appear as our spokespeople. How could any person who has only a passing interest in politics come away with a favorable impression...or get an idea that there are alternatives to the Republican agenda?

Any polls that put the Dems in the same low opinion as Republicans underscores just how effective the media has been in supressing any option to the Republican CW.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think many dropped their blinders today
I doubt they will get picked back up. They can spin their way into oblivion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I turned on the TV to watch Olberman, and caught the
Last 2 minutes of Tweety. He had on a Republican strategist, I don't remember the name.

Tweety said polls indicated Bushes numbers were the lowest of his presidency (39% approval) on the economy. This guy (A Republican strategist remember) said the economy was collapsing. Collapsing!

Slight downturn in unemployment, high oil prices, manufacturing way down. He said nobody has any confidence in the economy anymore. And nobody in Washington wants to talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I still blame Michael Jackson for Bush's low numbers.
Damn you, Jackson #5....Damn you......

It really is amazing the lengths our media will go to, to take the pressure of these low numbers off the Republicans. After all it's not like they're running everything.

They will forever whine about being the "underdogs" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. I Didn't Get Norah's Report That Way
In my book, she's one of the "good ones". Her report the other night was one of the few that stayed on the theme that Rove and others appear to be lying to Fitzgerald and that's where this investigation is going. She's smart and I really haven't noticed any real right wing bias in her reporting.

My take was that there's a growing disatisfaction with all politicians...and she's right. She was quoting the NBC/WSJ numbers. If you really wanna see a bad spin job, check out Timmy Russert's hatchet job that's posted on Crooks & Liars...he called liberals "secular" :wtf:

The thing that she points to, and honestly bothers me, is that the Repugnican and Bunnypants numbers have and continue to fall, but the Democratic numbers stay steady. Ironically, seems like every poll has the Democratic position at around 42-43 on everything.

Her point that I found of interest was how this attitude and polls are similar to those prior to the '94 elections...and something we should note. Many of our Democrats were caught pants down in that election and have paid dearly ever since. Now the shoe's on the other foot...let's kick some ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wasn't really her spin at first
but then Tweety started nudging her towards it, and she yielded. It's his agenda more than hers. Just remember how good she was the other day talking about how huge the Karl Rove thing was -- several days before it actually got to be huge in the eyes of the rest of the media. Give her a break -- blame it all on Tweety instead -- he deserves it in spades!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. LOL!!!
Lame-o! Can't even admit when they're not popular. :eyes: If I wasn't popular and I was a politician I'd at least admit it and figure out what I'm doing wrong and try to fix it and see what the people I'm repersenting say. This is so lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. But then you'd have to listen to the polls
and we all know what the chimp in charge thinks of polls....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC