Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calling all British! How do you define "fixed around?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:41 PM
Original message
Calling all British! How do you define "fixed around?"
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 12:42 PM by El Supremo
Americans may interpret "fixed" as in "throwing a game." Would you Brits only consider it to mean "fastened in place?" I think that since the word "But" starts off the sentence, it still means that it was an underhanded maneuver.

C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. SEX'd UP
but you might get yourself KILLED if you go n bring that up :evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Charles want to be "fixed around" Camilla's trousers?
Sorry, I couldn't resist. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Arranged around. Like a turkey with all the fixings (very much so!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. In which case the charge changes from creating the intelligence...
..to cherry-picking it.

Not quite as damning but still pretty damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. The charge is bolstered by this in the memo: "but the case was thin".
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 01:34 PM by DemItAllAnyway
All I can think of is Bush--and Cheney, and Rumsfeld, and Powell--saying "WE KNOW..." and "THERE IS NO DOUBT..." all along in the buildup to war. Their certainty is what swayed a lot of people. And it was built on nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. "cherry-picked" is what I interpreted as "fixed around". Let's say I have
a bag full of marbles. 100 of them are black and 10 of them are white. I show you all my white marbles, and point to the bag saying, "This is the amount of intelligence we have regarding Saddam's WMD program!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's what pisses me off about this. It. Doesn't. Matter.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 12:46 PM by comsymp
This is another red herring the R's are playing to distract from the point.

Let's agree, for the sake of argument, that the intelligence wasn't being manipulated- instead, the intelligence and facts were being affixed around the policy... AS OPPOSED TO THE POLICY BEING DRIVEN BY THE INTELLIGENCE AND FACTS.

How is that any less damning?

/rantlet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And, let's not forget the context of the rest of the minutes...
... all of which did more than just suggest that it was a done deal, they'd decided, and the only questions were of how to do it and make it look like it was legitimate.

All that, in the further context of the lies promoted by the entire Bush administration--including the threatening remarks about "mushroom clouds"--were intended to deceive.

This is just yet more evidence of that deception, to hide a conspiracy between two countries to invade a third, without provocation and without international consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly.
Jesus H Tapdancing Christ on a pogo stick - isn't that enough!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. "fixed" means...
..keeping the bits that bolster your case, and dismissing the ones that don't.

Fixed means fixed.

Plain English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's not "fixed around." It's "fixed around the policy."
The intelligence was being fixed (corrected, modified, retrofitted) around the policy. It's plain English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Exactly! That's why when Colin Powell stated "everything"
said they had WMDs (on TDS last night), it reinforced my thinking that they are now conducting the biggest dog and pony dance of their lives.

We know for a fact that statement is untrue. It was fixed and now that these minutes are out, they're in coverup mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TyeDye75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jmatthan explains it pretty well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Thanks. I knew it must have been brought up before. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. wizbangblog tried the argument and failed miserably
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't understand their point with this. If 'fixed around' dosn't mean
essentially the same thing in the UK as it does here, then why would there have been any controversy about the memo in the UK in the first place? Why would the Times of London published it? Why would Blair be questioned about it? Because if, like the REpubs are trying to spin, it menas the opposite of what we think it measn, the memo would in fact, support Blair and Bush, and they would be using it to show how they did not rush to war.

Am I crazy here? Does this make any sense? If it meant the facts and intelligence supported the administrations belief that there were WMD's this memo would be a huge asset to Blair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. excellent point.
the fact that it was explosive IN BRITAIN when it was revealed proves that "fixed" means just that, manipulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. It means sheep shagging
In obscure middle english, "Are you fixing around my sheep" means
"Are you trying to impregnate my sheep." So clearly the memo means that
blair was fucking the public.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rad23 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think this should explain it
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 05:23 PM by rad23
I thought I`d join but I do work for Paul....

Another scathing verbal attack by UK dj Paul Edge on this subject....

http://www.djpauledge.com/blog.php?id=91

Robin Niblett of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, says it would be easy for Americans to misunderstand the reference to intelligence being "fixed around" Iraq policy. " 'Fixed around' in British English means 'bolted on' rather than altered to fit the policy," he says.

Dear Mr Niblett.

I am English and have a degree in English Literature. I regret to inform you that you seem to have a basic misunderstanding of the English language, which for a Washington think tank (or should that be septic tank?) doesn`t surprise me.

However, far be it from me, an Englishman,to correct an American as to what our language means, but I`m afraid you have the definition of "fixed around" completely wrong, rather like the existence of WMDS eh?

Not to worry, I shall endeavour to put you straight whilst at the same time trying to refrain from excessive patronising sarcasm that your ignorance warrants, however, I am not too confident that I will be able to refrain from the latter...

Take Care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. And "around the bend means".........
well, around the bend.

In England we use "verb..around" in a number of ways. For example, a common phrase that is heard is "President Bush is around the bend"...This means, that President Bush is a psychotic lunatic who`s madness is a result of untreated alcoholism", it doesn`t mean, President Bush has been "bolted onto a turn in the road". Are you understanding yet Mr Niblett?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Just like American English, the obvious meaning is 'illicitly altered'
And a highly educated and intelligent man (either the head of SIS, or the PM's secretary) would be aware of that meaning, and wouldn't use it if he meant 'collected' or 'put in place'. Note that when asked, Blair didn't say "fixed means something different in the UK", he said "the facts were not being fixed". He failed to say why his head of intelligence said they were, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. If that were the case, there would be no story in Britain.
But this is a very big story in Britain.

They must mean exactly what we think they mean.

Clearly, someone is making a belated attempt to stifle the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC