Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives and majoritarianism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 11:37 PM
Original message
Conservatives and majoritarianism
I've noticed a trend of late, whereby people on the Right back up their arguments by falling back on majoritarianism: in other words, the idea that their ideas are legitimate and correct simply because (or allegedly because) a majority of the American people ratified them in the last election.

I post on over at another board that deals with mostly non-political topics. One time recently when the discussion turned political, this right-winger when on this rant about his ideas must surely be correct, because, by God, his guy won the last election. There was no defense of any of any conservative ideas at all. His argument was basically just "The majority agrees with me. Therefore I must be right and you must be wrong". Putting aside whether or not the Right really has the hearts and minds of a majority of Americans, I have to say that I have noticed such techniques of argument being increasingly used by the Right on various message boards on the internet. Not only is this a poor technique of argument, it also represents a misunderstanding of democracy and morality.

Need I remind people that in some cases for many years a clear majority of Americans supported slavery, segregation, Indian removal, the Vietnam War and the Iraq War.

Being in the majority may make you feel good and validated, but it does not ratify the correctness of your ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. This is a poor way to argue
Edited on Sun May-22-05 11:45 PM by EstimatedProphet
Additionally, an analogue of this is "You guys lost, so you're stupid" or the like. It's the whole idea that winning is everything.
Look where that leads-it's more important to win than be right, so whatever you do to win is acceptable. Sums up how the Republicans think quite well, IMO. The problem is that their followers that the Republicans keep ripping off feel this way too, so they feel like they "won" when they're getting pants'ed by the people they support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. The founding fathers
whom the repukes are so fond of invoking (except when they inconveniently don't agree with them) were very worried about what they referred to as the tyranny of the majority. I believe that was the reason for the 60% cloture rule in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is a Major Meme being repeated
almost as often as "up or down vote." (sam thing, actually)

It exposes the "Cornpone Nazis" (hehe) in at least 2 ways. Their "worldview" is all about Social Darwinism. EVERYTHING they argue about comes down to -- might makes right. (Iraq, anyone?)

Their sophomoric argument of might-makes-right has now morphed into "WE WIN, WE WIN, WE WIN.... so now we get to do any damned thing WE want because WE WON, WE WON."

They are exposing their arrogant and absolute contempt for a representative republic. Their WE WON chants are like a mob cheering a dictator.

Nevermind that the last 2 presidential elections have shown that "W" didn't "win." All that matters is POWER, even by 1% of the corrupt national vote.

In the Senate, the Democrats represent a larger percent of the population than the Republicans, so you can see where they are going. These WE WON freaks are blathering for minority rule that shuts out the larger population.

Reminds me of some really nasty history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC