speeches - but they should be household words. Even though I think they are saying what needs to be said (especially Kennedy, Kerry and Reid)- the Average Joe out there isn't watching. Isn't paying attention. Has very little to no clue what's happening.
But Average Joe does know the word Enron. And Halliburton.
THE ENRON AND HALLIBURTON CASES: Two notable past corporate-friendly cases ruled on by Owen involve very publicly known corporations - Halliburton and Enron - both of which had donated to Owen's judicial campaign. In the case of Sanchez v. Halliburton, a Halliburton field worker "won a $2.6 million verdict after the jury found that a company supervisor had framed him to test positive for cocaine." After an appeals court ruling overturned the verdict, Sanchez tried to bring the case to the Texas Supreme Court. In the months during which the case was before the Court, Halliburton made its only campaign donations to Texas Supreme Court justices that year, giving thousands of dollars to three justices: Priscilla Owen, Nathan Hect, and Alberto Gonzales. Result: the court declined to hear the case and the ruling overturning Sanchez's case stood. In Enron Corp. v. Spring Independent School District, Owen "authored the opinion for a unanimous court
that ... saved Enron $225,000 and resulted in lost revenue for the school district."
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/5/19/21387/6792When you call your Senators today, mention these so they can bring it up in their speeches. 5 days of non stop "up or down vote" is going to have it's mind-numbing effect - we need to put something out there that sticks just as much. And those two companies, besides representing everything that is wrong with Republican corporate "values" today, those two companies are already household words - we just need to keep repeating them, ad nauseum.