The Journal of Psychohistory addresses "The New 9/11 Scandal"

[drduffy]

Never have posted before. So I am not sure if I am doing this in the right place or the right way or if it is duplicated somewhere. But I am a Clin Psych and was apprised of the current edition of this well known, reputable, psychology journal and that it has a very good expose on Bush et. al. complicity in 9/11.

web address: http://www.psychohistory.com/index.html

DID BUSH KNOW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE?
Get the current Special Issue of The Journal of Psychohistory on what Bush knew about 9/11 in advance, with explosive evidence from seven new books showing how the FAA was told to ignore all the appeals from air controllers to intercept the hijacked planes, how audio tapes and photos were destroyed that pointed to collusion by the Bush team, how Rumsfeld has said 9/11 was "a blessing in disguise", and much more.

It's a good journal. Support it if you can.
dr rw

[drduffy]

1. I know

that this issue is well-known by members of this list...as it is with me. But. This is the first time this issue has been addressed by a main stream journal in psychology. I am excited by it. But that's probably because I am a psychologist.

[RBHam]

2. Thank you.

Sooner or later, those that refuse to see will have an epiphany.

I'm just worried that it'll be too late by then.

Plus, the BEE has many minions to distract and dissuade - to slander and insult - you will find that out soon enough.

The American people apparently can't handle the truth, and as Hitler proved - the BIG LIE works.

[seemslikeadream]

3. Thanks drduffy

:hi:

[JitterbugPerfume]

5. Interesting

Welcome to DU

I hope to hear more from you!

[Window]

4. Thank you for this.

.

[The Doctor.]

6. Then you may be familiar with Piaget...

and you know that most cognitive schemas will not tolerate this.

It is unlikely to achieve a societal 'absolute threshold'.

But hey - great reference.

[freeplessinseattle]

14. Piaget is not the end all be all, great as the concepts are

what happened to being ecletic?

[The Doctor.]

16. The reference was meant to equate Piaget's

subjects and the level of cognizance of most Americans.
He did most of his studies on children.
It was a light backhand.

Eclecticism is not commonly resolved or reconciled by the cognitive schematics of the vast majority.
Americans are generally too 'well-established' to allow non pre-aligned concepts into their mental framework.

[preciousdove]

7. Not all links work and the create date is 5/19

Probably not legitimate?

[JohnyCanuck]

8. Is There Any Truth in 'The 9/11 Truth Movement?

Is There Any Truth in 'The 9/11 Truth Movement?'

In the Media
Steve Hammons
Research analyst
IntelDesk.com
April 28, 2005

<snip>

The 9/11 Truth Movement" is a phrase being used to describe a wide range of people and organizations who are asking these questions and digging up information that appears on the surface to be quite serious if true.

One of the major questions being asked is if anyone in the U.S. Government had foreknowledge that a terrorist attack was being planned using airliners as weapons. And if so, did they deliberately allow the attacks to occur so this new Pearl Harbor-like event would create a desired climate in America.

The idea that officials within our government would allow innocent Americans to be killed to advance other goals and agendas is difficult for many to believe. Surely this is impossible. Yet, 9/11 investigators keep coming up with allegations that make us wonder.

Researchers within The 9/11 Truth Movement put forth interesting allegations and hypothesize about possible motivations for powerful people to want an event like the 9/11 attacks to occur. The investigative reports, facts, theories, allegations and hypotheses are spelled out in several books, films and Web sites.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050430011519490

The author continues by summarizing a few of the apparent anomalies re. the 911 attacks that have fed the conspiracy theories.

For example: The financial trading prior to 911 that indicated some individuals were taking advantage of foreknowledge of the event.

The many warning that were coming from intelligence agencies all over the world and which appear to have been ignored or not acted on in any meaningful manner.

The delayed response in getting fighter aircraft into position to intercept the hijacked aircraft.

The missile instead of a plane theory that a missile and not a plane hit the Pentagon (I know this particular issue is seen by many of the 911 skeptics as disinfo designed to make it easy to discredit all non-sanctioned investigations into 911).

In response to the above article one of the organizers of the citizens' inquiries into 911 posted as a response:

In January 2002, a delegation of people from Human Rights and Peace organizations marched on our Senators and Congresswoman's offices to demand a Congressional Investigation of 9-11. We raised some of the questions raised in the article, but also a key question that was not mentioned- Why were top US government officials meeting from September 3rd- September 13th with the "Money Man Behind 9-11" (who had $100,000 wired to Mohammed Atta- identified by the FBI as the lead terrorist in the attack on the WTC)? Immediately Bush and Cheney asked Daschle to limit the investigations and have the "official inquiry" limited to "intelligence failures" and headed by the CIA and the very men who should have been investigated. Porter Goss and Bob Graham (who chaired the joint House/Senate Intelligence Oversite Committee's official Inquiry) on the morning of September 11th were having breakfast with the ISI's Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad who ordered the $100,000 to be wired to Atta. Whatever the truth is about September 11th, we do know that the government is lying about it, covering it up, destroying evidence, and has presented "unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about what happened" to sell their wars to the American people and to justify their trashing of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the construction of the National Security State.

<snip>



http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050430011519490

[Al-CIAda]

9. 9/11 was an inside job. n/t

[Karenina]

10. D'oh.

:silly:

[jazzjunkysue]

11. Nice to know I'm only as crazy as the pros. 'Course, the Moonies are

perfectly sane, and they practically run the current administration, from a secret, undisclosed location. The capitol.

[truth2power]

12. Unfortunately,

it looks like you have to subscribe to get this special edition. this article needs to be more widely disseminated.

I'm going to see if my public library has it, or maybe my local university library (almost certainly they'd have it).

edit> typo

[drduffy]

13. thank you

for the nice welcome. I received my copy of the journal today. On first blush the article appears to be very good.

Like one poster above, I worry that critical mass will occur too late. But I have been talking to colleagues and showing the 'In plane Site' video and sharing Dr. David R. Griffin's book, 'The New Pearl Harbor...' You all probably know this but it was nice that his presentation at the University of Wisconsin a few weeks ago was filmed and shown on CSPAN2 twice and will be shown again. All I can do is to keep trying to talk to people and get involved politically her in NC.

[LightningFlash]

15. Griffen had a eye opening documentary on C-SPAN.

Tune in to your local channel and see if you can catch a rerun of it.

[Beetwasher]

17. I'm Part of The Psychohistory Email List

and have been a follower of Lloyd deMause's work for quite some time now.

Welcome to DU!!!