Bush ratings @ 43%? Up goes the terror threat levels...

[Imagevision]

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

WASHINGTON — A terrorist attack on chemical plants lacking enough federal oversight could cause mass casualties, a former homeland security adviser to the White House told senators on Wednesday.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,154841,00.html

[expatriot]

1. Rule #4 for posting in LBN

4. When posting articles, always use the published title of the article as the title of the discussion thread. Additional information may be included in a thread title (in parentheses) if it helps to make the title more clear.

[mahina]

2. Boo!

boogedyboogedybooogedy.

[Nite Owl]

3. They are just getting around to

realizing this? Didn't Kerry talk about this last year and I think CBS did a big piece on this on 60 minutes.

[Mr_Spock]

4. Faux "News"

uggh, I'm gonna puke

[jojo54]

5. So go ahead, write stories about how vulnerable they are,

tell us EXACTLY how the terrorists can carry out an attack on the plants, and don't forget to tell us how many people will die outright or in the next few years. You guys are doing a great job, but are you sure it's not for the OTHER side?!?!

Damn, nothing like the MSM hanging OUR asses out to the wind.

[Roland99]

6. Chemical plant security *is* an issue that needs to be addressed.

We can't do nothing.

[Voltaire99]

7. You said it, Imagevision. Our civil defense sirens started blaring...

...recently--on a sunny day, not the first of the month, for reasons mysterious.

And the first thing we wondered was: "Has Bush broken through 40%?"

[tallahasseedem]

8. Here we go again...

it used to be somewhat amusing that they would pull this crap. Now its friggin ridiculous.

[melnjones]

9. hmmm

"A terrorist attack on chemical plants lacking enough federal oversight could cause mass casualties"

Well, no kidding. This isn't news. Gotta love fox for stating the obvious in an attempt to scare the crap out of everyone.