Would you remove the feeding tube from Tom Delay?

[Postman]

n/t

[edbermac]

1. Oh, don't tease me...

[ET Awful]

2. Nah, I'd just feed him the same stuff he's been feeding the nation

for years.

[Horse with no Name]

10. I don't think you get fit all that shit down the tube. eom

[ET Awful]

13. Well that depends on the size of the tube doesn't it?

[Snotcicles]

3. What would it cost me? n/t

[wildmanj]

4. would u

do cock roaches have feeding tubes

[fryguy]

5. remove? i wouldn't have let it be put in - n/t

[donheld]

6. I wouldn't put a feeding tube in Delay to start with

let the fucker starve

[whistle]

7. In Tom DeLay's case I'd order removal of his colostomy bag!

[tnlefty]

14. You beat me to it! Would he then evaporate?

Just asking.

[markus]

15. Can we route his colostomy opening into his feeding tube?

Just wondering.

[Jacobin]

19. Perhaps with a little electric pump on a timer, we could get this to work

I think its worth experimenting with anyway.

:-)

[whistle]

16. Like a balloon flying around the room

:bounce:

[Jersey Ginny]

8. I wouldn't care. If he were a veggie he wouldn't talk

I could piously and hypocritically espouse the value of "life" with Delay as a vegetable.

[KamaAina]

9. Hell no...

I'd just fire a big ol' load of Raid down there and let Nature take its course!!! :evilgrin:

[BrainRants]

11. The one that already feeds him from the tube coming out of his ass?

He's not just full of shit, he's a self sustaining shit factory!

[B Calm]

12. Hell NO! I would let him lay there in a veggie state.

[dsewell]

17. To quote the British serviceman

... whom I shared a train compartment with once in the '80s, altering his judgment of Maggie Thatcher: "If his brains were on fire, I wouldn't piss in his ear to put it out."

[gizmo1979]

18. wouldn't but the tube in ,in the first place.