Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

isn`t the rethugs blowing a big hole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 06:46 PM
Original message
isn`t the rethugs blowing a big hole
in their sancity of marrage bewteen a man and woman? doesn`t teri`s husband have the right? you know the fundy belief that the husband has dominance of the wife? i find it very interesting..
oh by the the way- my sisters and i made the same decision for our mother awhile ago..so to delay and the fucking scum in either party..may god have no mercy on your souls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard Bugman say on news conference the other day that
Sanctity of Life trumps Sanctity of Marriage.

Which, of course, is hypocritical baloney. But that's the talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Freepers take on that
Edited on Sun Mar-20-05 06:53 PM by pscot
Is that Michael Schiavo is a wife beater and a philanderer who has deserted his wife in her hour of need, and who now wants to kill her so he can keep all the settlement money and live in sin with his girlfriend. They are working themselves into a fine state of hysteria over there. Here's a brief summary taken directly from FR. As you can see they are barely coherent:

1) she has had not representation other than her husband, who was having an affair and pissed all the malpractice money away

2) No rehabilitation was even attempted on her. she is conscience and not in a coma

3) The judge violated the subpoena of the US Congress to impose a judiciary dictatorship over a woman who cannot defend herself

4) Under Florida law she was denied due process.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC