Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a simple primer about "Yellow-cake", Uranium & nuclear bombs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 05:21 AM
Original message
a simple primer about "Yellow-cake", Uranium & nuclear bombs
Uranium

This "very tiny" summary of Uranium is for everybody who wants to know more about "yellow-cake", nuclear bombs, and all that. As our National debate continues on the bush* "yellowcake" lies, a CHEMIST has stepped up to present this overview. So here it is, with very fascinating links for all you "science buffs", who want to explore further.

_____________________

Uranium (Element #92, abbreviated "U", named after the Planet Uranus)

Plutonium (Element #94, abbreviated "Pu", named after the Planet Pluto)

When purified into a suitable chemical compound, BOTH these elements can be used to generate power in a Nuclear Power Plant. In a different chemical form, BOTH these elements can be used to make NUCLEAR BOMBS. Both elements are radioactive, meaning that they emit dangerous radiation for thousands of years (radiation is high energy particles that disrupt molecular structures, causing your body chemistry to malfunction in many ways, often forming cancers)

Uranium exists in the earth, and can be located and mined by geologists.

Plutonium is a "human-made" element, that only exists where scientists created it. The first Plutonium was created by the USA for making nuclear bombs in WWII. (That let the genie out of the bottle, creating an element! We have "poisoned ourselves" with major environmental damage, from an insidious world-class toxicant. For over 50 years now, discussions continue over what to do with Pu, where to store it, and how to clean up this mess).

_________________________

There are essentially two BIG steps to making a nuclear bomb:

1. Extract Uranium from the ground, process and extract it to make "yellowcake"

2. Chemically separate the Uranium isotopes, and purify those chemicals. (U can then be used by itself for a nuclear bomb, as the Hiroshima bomb) or take it further, in a nuclear reaction to create Plutonium (as the Nagasaki bomb). Either U or Pu can also be used to generate power in nuclear power plants.)

These are VERY COMPLEX and expensive steps. The closer that you get to the final purified U or Pu, the more valuable the chemical compounds become, and the more dangerous. The more steps are completed, the easier to make a nuclear bomb from it. "Yellowcake" is light-years away from a final nuclear bomb, but the possession of yellowcake eliminates ONE difficult step.

Uranium is removed from the earth in mining operations. After removing it from the earth, the ore must be processed using chemicals to extract the actual Uranium.

Here is info on mining Uranium, the production process: from blasting to shipping…
http://www.rossing.com/uranium_production.htm

A huge amount of rock must be processed to get a tiny bit of Uranium, which is then called "yellowcake", because it's a yellow compressed powder. The mining leaves a huge environmental mess, as shown here.



Geologists call these Uranium chemical compounds: Minerals, and have "geological names", while chemists have a very organized naming system that allows you to draw the chemical structure and predict the chemical reactions.

Here's a list (with some pictures) of different chemical forms of Uranium, with the geological names, and the chemical formulas…
http://webmineral.com/chem/Chem-U.shtml

______________________________

There are TWO kinds of reactions that Uranium undergoes

1. Chemical reactions with other compounds, such as sulfur, oxygen, fluorine, and nitrogen. If you hit element 92, you can explore all the chemical forms of Uranium, and many crystal structures, Uranium - sulfides, oxides, fluorides and more…(on the left side), and the colors of each chemical compound.
http://www.webelements.com/

2. Nuclear Reactions. Physicists change the number of neutrons in the center of the atom, and create NEW elements. For Uranium (Atomic Number 92), the physicist adds two neutrons to create Plutonium (Atomic Number 94).

Before the physicists can create Plutonium, or use Uranium for a nuclear bomb, it must be purified by a very complex, environmentally damaging series of chemical extractions. The manufacturing plants for this process are VERY large, and in the USA, include the Hanford Plant in Washington, the Rocky Flats plant in Denver, and the Pantex Plant in the Pan Handle of Texas….with a variety of other manufacturing plant making components like electrical and explosives. These plants are not "mobile" and cannot be "hidden". An example of just ONE plant is shown here:

Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons plant
http://www.em.doe.gov/bemr96/rfts.html




Read more about the chemical separation of Uranium isotopes, and the creation of Plutonium here
http://www.uic.com.au/nip50.htm

Here is a site that covers the complex history of Uranium and Plutonium in bombs..
http://www.atomicarchive.com/


After chemical purification in these HUGE manufacturing facilities, nuclear reactions are used to create Plutonium. For Uranium (Atomic Number 92), the physicist adds two neutrons to create Plutonium (Atomic Number 94).

here's pics of the interior of the Nuclear Reactor at the U of Missouri - Rolla.
http://web.umr.edu/~reactor/

Plutonium manufacture and fabrication
http://nuketesting.enviroweb.org/hew/Library/Plutonium/


Pu and U are always emitting radiation continuously for thousands of years.
These emissions are primarily dangerous alpha, beta, and gamma rays that damage cells, quickly, causing radiation burns/poisoning, and long-term, causing cancers.

here's another "Periodic Chart of the Elements" with links on bottom to explain everything (from the chemists at Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratories)
http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/default.htm

if you like pretty green-yellow glass, here is a link to the "Uranium Glass Gallery" where you can learn more about exotic collector glass made with radioactive Uranium.
http://www.parkcity.ne.jp/~ken-toma/

In recent news stories, Uranium and Plutonium have been called radionuclides, nuclear materials and radioactive isotopes and more. All of these names are correct, but emphasize different properties. Because these atoms are so BIG and heavy (atoms are smallest at the top of the Periodic Chart and biggest at the bottom), they are also called "heavy" metals.

______________________________

Here is little background on "The Atom", so you can better understand the terminology and the reactions:

1. The nucleus (the center) of an atom is composed of positively-charged particles called "protons" and neutral particles called "neutrons".

2. The atomic number is the number of protons found in the nucleus. For example: Uranium is Atomic Number 92, which means that there are 92 protons in the nucleus (92 - positively charged particles in the center of the atom). Plutonium is Atomic Number 94, which means that there are 94 protons in the nucleus.

3. Electrons are negatively charged particles that circulate continuously around the center of the atom, like the planets circulating around the sun. Chemical reactions often use the outermost electrons to join elements to each other.

4. Isotopes are atoms that have the same number of protons (positive-charged particles), and that gives the isotopes the SAME Atomic Number. But, the isotopes have different numbers of neutrons (neutral particles). Uranium has 14 isotopes, all are radioactive. The isotopes are commonly written as U-235 (meaning that there are 235 neutrons in that isotope) or U-238 (meaning that there are 238 neutrons in that isotope).

Both U and Pu are very chemically reactive. As a metal, these elements chemically react on contact with air, which is called "pyrophoric". This property has caused many fires and explosions when handling the purified metal. Even in other chemical forms, the continuous emission of radioactivity eats through almost all materials: glass, steel, plastics. U and Pu are dangerous, both for their chemical and nuclear properties. Pu is so chemically reactive, it reacts with virtually every non-metal in the Periodic Table of the Elements, except the Nobel Gases.

To conduct any of the nuclear reactions, one must first clean-up (purify) the chemical compounds. The purification processes are very complex, dangerous, and toxic.

nuclear fission from the chemists…
http://www.chemsoc.org/timeline/pages/1945.html

_________________________

There are TWO nuclear problems going on in the bush* Iraq debacle.

1. The bush* claim that "yellowcake" was being purchased from Niger to make nuclear bombs in Iraq. Recently, bush* minions admitted that this claim is a lie.

2. A defunct nuclear plant in Iraq, inspected and regulated by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Commission). During the war, the scientists all left. The plant was NOT protected by American soldiers (as they were busy protecting the OIL ministry), and the plant was vandalized. This resulted in many unsuspecting people being poisoned by the "yellowcake" left in drums, as they took the drums to store their drinking water. These people will DIE horrible deaths. In addition, there is now a "missing" yellowcake and other radioactive materials, such as purified Uranium (that may be used to make nuclear bombs).

This bush* mess is extremely dangerous for the whole world, since these nuclear materials could be in the hands of terrorists, with the looting of the plant just a cover.

about the IAEC (International Atomic Energy Agency
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/About/Profile/

the IAEA and Tuwaitha and Rashdiya facilities in Iraq
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Programmes/ActionTeam/nwp2.html

The IAEA reports, as of December 1998:
" There were no indications that there remains in Iraq any physical capability for the production of amounts of weapons-usable nuclear material of any practical significance."



massive storeroom full of Plutonium in containers at Rocky Flats
(America has plenty of Plutonium, and we have NO IDEA where to store all this
and the radioactive waste from nuclear power plants.
Bush* decided recently to start producing MORE Plutonium).


The end product of this entire process, starting with the mining of Uranium: Plutonium buttons to make bombs:


photo of the refined Plutonium "buttons" used in the Fat Man Bomb to destroy Nagasaki,
create by the USA. Notice the "pitting" on the right button, as the Pu continues to react.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. any comments ? nt
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomReload Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great Stuff
It will take me time to digest it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks. it was a lot of work....welcome to DU, FreedomReload...
Edited on Sat Jul-12-03 09:27 PM by amen1234
haven't noticed you here before....

I thought that DUer's needed some more info on 'Yellowcake', as this discussion seems to be at a critical point...no need to show ourselves as lacking pertinent information....

glad you are here...first comment on my effort...

:hi: :hi: :hi:

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:



:nuke:





on edit: there's some really great web links in there...if you are a science nerd....or a chemist enthusiast....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks!
I have been kicking this subject around for two days.

It does not seem to create much interest.

The fake papers said Iraq was trying to buy

Yellow cake Uranium in Niger...LIE NUMBER ONE.

Bush* in the SOTU said based on the fake information

That Iraq was trying to aquire Uranium.

LIE NUMBER TWO based on lie number one.

Blair further streached the first two lies by Bush*

into LIE NUMBER THREE; Iraq was seeking nuclear materials

in Niger.

Each lie was intended to bull shit the public into

believing Iraq was months away from Nuclear fission bombs.

All lies. Keep saying that. All lies.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. even if you bought yellowcake...you'd still need those giant
facitities like Rocky Flat, Hanford, and Pantex (all three) to purify the yellowcake, and then create Plutonium, and then assemble a nuclear bomb....

it's a challenging and expensive project...the purification of Uranium is usually done with HOT Hydrofluoric Acid, which eats right through glass, steel, everything...hard to work with and dangerous...

there is no doubt that at one time, Iraq TRIED to make nuclear materials, to use in a nuclear bomb...but if you review the IAEA links, there is NO EVIDENCE of any functioning manufacturing facitities to do that prior to the bush* war....

and it's a long long way from TRYING to make nuclear bombs, and actually having the ability to do so...which bush* claimed was just months away...such work is technically challenging, dangerous (there has been many fires, explosions, and radiation releases here in America in our efforts)...expensive, not portable or able to hide....it is absurb to think the Iraq could make and deliver a nuclear bomb in a few months...(maybe, if they could buy the purified Plutonium from N. Korea, Russia, or China, but not in a few months just from "yellowcake")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. According to what I have
read (On the internet) Five countries process yellow cake into U/238-U/235.

France, UK, USA, Russia and Canada.

Then the U235 must be separated from the U238/U235.

Only the U235 is weapons grade.

A long expensive dangerous process.

Then one must figure out how to make the bomb.

It will not be done in the garage.

Bush* and Blair the Bull shiting duo.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. the making of the actual BOMB is not included in the above
information....as you noted...I only showed from the mining of the Uranium to the creation of the little Plutonium "buttons" (amazing stuff...those two little "buttons" vaporized a whole city in seconds!)....

yes, making a bomb from the Plutonium "buttons" is another GREAT high tech challenge, and the entire nuclear explosion might totally fail if that wasn't designed and constructed correctly...and THEN, you need to DELIVER the bomb to the USA...or wherever you were intending it to be delivered...

for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, USA dropped the bomb out of plane, but now, a missile would probably deliver it...a 6000 mile journey ???

IMO blair and bush* claimed that Iraqis were going to deliver an atomic bomb to us in about 45 minutes...lies, lies...and Condi added the remark about a "mushroom cloud"...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It might be kind of hard to bury Rocky Flats under a rose bush.
Seriously, the kind of operation necessary to process uranium into a form suitable for nukes would be detectable in a New York minute, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. even the purchase of specialized parts raises red flags...the
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 12:14 AM by amen1234
"yellow cake" is manufactured under the watchful eye of the IAEC...it can't just be sold or transferred without raising red flags...plus, if you look at the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) links...there were some "attempts" to manufacture weapons grade Uranium and Plutonium, and they only got partially there...all of it was bombed back to oblivion, in the first Gulf War


no, you can't hide it under a "bush*" in your backyard...purchase of the necessary extraction chemicals will raise red flags, and as the photos show, it's not a kitchen sink or a garage operation, it's a great big industrial operation and you can see it from an airplane (you can see Rocky Flats from any hill in the neighborhood, no plane needed), and likely everyone in the neighborhood will smell the chemicals wafting off the site...

and, likely as not, even if you're good at it, you could well hurt/kill yourself and ruin your neighbors in the effort (and we've done a fairly good job of poisoning/killing ourselves with explosions, and fires on our nuclear manufacturing facilities, and WE are the BEST...a third-world country would be seriously challenged to meet our capabilities)....

a more serious threat that bush* has totally ignored and de-funded, the efforts under Clinton to inventory and control the Plutonium in Russia (since the chaotic collapse of the Soviet Union leaving many scientists in poverty)... and provide jobs for displaced Russian scientists, so they don't become desperate and take to selling loosely controlled stocks of completely manufactured weapons-grade Plutonium (those little Plutonium "buttons" shown at end of my main post)...bush* is once again the fool for not putting money into that effort....it is easy to imagine an Aldrich Ames or another traitor selling Russian Plutonium...IMHO, this is the BIGGEST national security issue that endangers us today...but as usual, bush* remains asleep at the wheel...and bush* has been told about that from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the IAEA, and the GAO (General Accounting Office), who has found that money allocated for that effort has been mis-spent on other projects...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Re: "bush* has totally ignored and de-funded...
...the efforts under Clinton to inventory and control the Plutonium in Russia...." Howard Dean brought this subject up today at the Dean For America rally in Tucson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. really glad to hear that...this is THE most important nuclear
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 12:05 AM by amen1234
security issue for OUR homeland security (hate that term: homeland security...it sounds so, ah ah ah... nazi)

good for Dean...and I sincerely hope that others get after this RIGHT NOW, like our current Congress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. thank you
It helps to SEE what is involved in producing nukes. Contrast these to the pics of the few tiny things buried over a decade ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. more pictures are at the links...tried to keep it short, but it is a
VERY complex and expensive process...it saddens me how much bush* manipulated the American people...seemed to be that he was way too anxious about WAR as the only option....

those little rusted rings from a centrifuge was really pathetic, expecially when you understand what's really required to make Plutionium or purify Uranium...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. WOW!
There is certainly a lot of information here to digest, but we owe it to ourselves to become educated on this subject so we can more easily spot the lies that are constantly spewing forth from the Bush* administration. At least this story has finally caught fire in the media, but it's an exercise in frustration listening to the sudden outrage because this is hardly a new story.:grr:

Thank you for all the effort that you put into gathering this information! This is definitely one for the bookmarks!:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you
that is very interesting and informative. Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. greatly appreciate your compliment...worked hard on this...

knowledge is POWER...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. as bush* minions continue to spin this on TV today....just thought
more people might want to see what REAL nuclear facilities and nuclear manufacturing looks like....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Your hard work is obvious and appreciated
Yes, considering the recent headlines, this post definitely deserves a good, swift

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. May I urge you to do something more?
I urge you to take those four pictures in your original post, and modify your text to make it suitable to a mass audience as a brief article, then sell it to something like Atlantic Monthly, Harpers, the New Yorker, or even a newspaper like USA Today.

This is very, very informative. Back 40 years ago, there was a lot more info available to the average person than now, because nuclear war was an everpresent threat then.

There is a great deal of anxiety and uncertainty in the country now because people don't have the information necessary to judge for themselves who's telling the truth and who's lying. This article makes it clear that anybody refining U or Pu is going to be able to be detected doing it. The buttons are incredible. The panoramic picture is stunning.

Great work. Thanks for taking the time to do it for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I agree! That's a terrific idea! The timing is perfect for this
The yellowcake uranium story is still making headlines, thanks to Joseph Wilson's NY Times piece and appearance on ``Meet the Press.'' Now they are going after his wife.

I was just saying that I hope that the press keeps after this story until the American public gets it. This great primer would certainly help. Most of them still believe that Saddam had WMDs and that they were found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waldenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. re: looting
A small correction about the material looted.
None of the missing uranium is purified, it is just natural mined uranium. So unless some "terrorists" have a cascade of gas centrifuges and billion dollar facilities....the looted material is worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CafeToad Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Come on guys - It's not really that difficult to build the bomb
The following instructions are readily available over the internet. Steps are given below:

2.CONSTRUCTION METHOD

1.First, obtain about 50 pounds (110 kg) of weapons grade Plutonium at your local supplier (see NOTE 1). A nuclear power plant is not recommended, as large quantities of missing Plutonium tends to make plant engineers unhappy. We suggest that you contact your local terrorist organization, or perhaps the Junior Achievement in your neighborhood.

2.Please remember that Plutonium, especially pure, refined Plutonium, is somewhat dangerous. Wash your hands with soap and warm water after handling the material, and don't allow your children or pets to play in it or eat it. Any left over Plutonium dust is excellent as an insect repellant. You may wish to keep the substance in a lead box if you can find one in your local junk yard, but an old coffee can will do nicely.

3.Fashion together a metal enclosure to house the device. Most common varieties of sheet metal can be bent to disguise this enclosure as, for example, a briefcase, a lunch pail, or a Buick. Do not use tinfoil.

4.Arrange the Plutonium into two hemispheral shapes, separated by about 4 cm. Use rubber cement to hold the Plutonium dust together.

5.Now get about 100 pounds (220 kg) of trinitrotoluene (TNT). Gelignite is much better, but messier to work with. Your helpful hardware man will be happy to provide you with this item.

6.Pack the TNT around the hemisphere arrangement constructed in step 4. If you cannot find Gelignite, fell free to use TNT packed in with Playdo or any modeling clay. Colored clay is acceptable, but there is no need to get fancy at this point.

7.Enclose the structure from step 6 into the enclosure made in step 3. Use a strong glue such as "Crazy Glue" to bind the hemisphere arrangement against the enclosure to prevent accidental detonation which might result from vibration or mishandling.

8.To detonate the device, obtain a radio controlled (RC) servo mechanism, as found in RC model airplanes and cars. With a modicum of effort, a remote plunger can be made that will strike a detonator cap to effect a small explosion. These detonatior caps can be found in the electrical supply section of your local supermarket. We recommend the "Blast-O-Mactic" brand because they are no deposit-no return.

9.Now hide the completed device from the neighbors and children. The garage is not recommended because of high humidity and the extreme range of temperatures experienced there. Nuclear devices have been known to spontaneously detonate in these unstable conditions. The hall closet or under the kitchen sink will be perfectly suitable.

10.Now you are the proud owner of a working thermonuclear device! It is a great ice-breaker at parties, and in a pinch, can be used for national defense.

3.THEORY OF OPERATION

The device basically works when the detonated TNT compresses the Plutonium into a critical mass. The critical mass then produces a nuclear chain recation similar to the domino chain reaction (discussed in this column, "Dominos on the March", March, 1968 ). The chain reaction then promptly produces a big thermonuclear reaction. And there you have it, a 10 megaton explosion!


OK, you probably recognize the above-listed instructions as a joke. But you may recall in the early days after 9-11 there were a number of hysterical reports that Al-Qaeda was found to be in possession of documents describing how to build a nuclear bomb.

What was less hyped and not reported to any great degree was this angle:

Al Qaeda Duped?
Nuke Manual Looks Like Internet Hoax
November 16th, 2001 5:30 PM

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Suddenly, Al Qaeda doesn't look so smart. Just yesterday, a Times of London reporter found a cache of plans, left in a Kabul home as the Taliban retreated, that included notes for making a thermonuclear device. The papers sent a chill through the Western world, since they appeared to indicate sophisticated designs for an atom bomb.

Now the online Daily Rotten says at least part of those documents photographed by the Times are taken verbatim from a "semi-famous" pseudo-document that has been circulating on the Internet for years. It's a reprint of a scientific parody called "How to Build an Atom Bomb," from the geek-humor newsletter Annals of Improbable Research, originally known as the Journal of Irreproducible Results.

In his report for the BBC, reporter Anthony Loyd held some of the papers up for the camera, giving a glimpse of documents the Daily Rotten now compares to the 1979 parody.

Even the language Loyd uses to paraphrase the abandoned material sounds like that of the satirical document.

More at http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0147/ridgeway2.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC