Freeps react to Gannon's Outing as Prostitute (Denial, Lib'rul Media, etc.

[elehhhhna]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1343026/posts

Bloggers defaming and slandering Freepers, what can we do?
America Blog


Posted on 02/14/2005 10:59:37 AM PST by Dimona


Check out http://americablog.blogspot.com

This is crap! Liberals are making up lies about Jeff Gannon and the Administration, and attempting to paint the Bush Administration as hypocrites. Can't this be considerered libel or slander or something?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: THISISCHAT; THISISNOTNEWS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



1 posted on 02/14/2005 10:59:37 AM PST by Dimona
< Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: Dimona
Not if the liberals hold all the cards, and in cases of publicity they always do.



2 posted on 02/14/2005 11:01:30 AM PST by Free and Armed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

[elehhhhna]

1. OMG They Killed the thread!!!!!

[Career Prole]

5. Aye, that they did!

This thread has been pulled.

Pulled on 02/14/2005 11:03:41 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

No thanks

[Village Idiot]

25. You B@astards!!!!

[dave123williams]

2. HILARIOUS - they should look at the photographs...

Watch the roaches scramble...

[StClone]

21. Do Freepers come to DU to get the truth?

The canned nature of what they get at NotSoFreeRepublican should have them searching their souls.

[Beaverhausen]

3. that is the funniest thing I have seen in a while

"attempting to paint the Bush Administration as hypocrites"

Because as we all know...


thanks for the laugh.

[Cooley Hurd]

4. I guess they didn't see the pictures...

...at least not in the present context.:evilgrin:

[elehhhhna]

6. A diff. thread...a stupid post:

To: ArmyBratproud
If you visit the blog now, it has a bunch of pictures that, IMO, definitively proves that "Gannon" was an online male prostitute. At worst, this means he lied on CNN about those sites. But so what? Who DOESN'T lie about their sexual mores? I can think of one president who did, under oath...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342949/posts

[Straight Shooter]

10. Is Clinton God or something? They constantly invoke his name.

It's a kneejerk response. One of their own is in trouble, they all start whining and pointing at Clinton, "Waaaahhhhh, he did it, too!"

george w. bush in the absolute dark, no talking allowed so that the voice cannot be identified, gannon not allowed to touch the man but waiting for his touch, not knowing who the man is, sensing however it's someone in power.

Hey, gannon, did the man you serviced in the White House have baby hands?

:evilgrin:

[Ganja Ninja]

7. Truth to a freeper is like water to the wicked witch of the west.

:evilgrin:

[Walt Starr]

8. Thread already pulled

but the male prostitute is still a member:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~jeffgannon/

[leftchick]

9. um... did they even look at the photos?

hard to argue with a photogragh. LOTS of them. What a pig!

[phusion]

11. They can't handle the truth...

RW'ers have never been able to handle the truth.

No surprise they pulled the thread already.

[tx_dem41]

12. Okay, which one you guys or gals started that thread?

;)

[janx]

13. Here's another one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342949/posts

To: ArmyBratproud

If you visit the blog now, it has a bunch of pictures that, IMO, definitively proves that "Gannon" was an online male prostitute. At worst, this means he lied on CNN about those sites. But so what? Who DOESN'T lie about their sexual mores? I can think of one president who did, under oath...

38 posted on 02/14/2005 11:59:51 AM MST by Zach Bash
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies | Report Abuse >
To: Zach Bash
If you visit the blog now, it has a bunch of pictures that, IMO, definitively proves that "Gannon" was an online male prostitute. At worst, this means he lied on CNN about those sites. But so what? Who DOESN'T lie about their sexual mores? I can think of one president who did, under oath...

That's not the point. We have to draw the line here. This guy was a prostitute who lied about being a journalist. What was he doing in close proximity to the president? Who vetted him?
39 posted on 02/14/2005 12:12:45 PM MST by huck von finn
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies | Report Abuse >
To: Zach Bash
The left wing boards are reaming this guy for making the sexual angle such a big deal. Apparently, the "tolerant" bunch is having problems outing a fellow traveler.

The most hilarious portion of his "research" is where he equates Gannon's White House visits to Monica Lewinsky's visits. Try as he might, he just can't seem to find proof that Gannow was servicing anyone in the current Whitehouse. Apparently, it is treasonous to have a closeted gay prostitute working in the basement of the Whitehouse but it is ok to have what might as well be a female prostitute working her trade in the Oval Office.
40 posted on 02/14/2005 12:16:26 PM MST by jhouston
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

It'll be pulled soon too, no doubt...

[crispini]

16. I agree with this poster:

What was he doing in close proximity to the president? Who vetted him?

[janx]

20. That poster is not a freeper...

;-)

[crispini]

24. Hee! ;)

[aka-chmeee]

17. jhouston post

Glad they brought that up, I always wondered what the chances were that Monica was being paid by the Repugs.:evilgrin:

[w13rd0]

18. Um, "Gannon" was SERVICING BUSH...

...we all saw it on NATIONAL TV. If those dumbass questions he asks aren't the verbal, political equivalent of a sloppy knob job, nothing is...

[Old and In the Way]

30. hehehe....good point.

Not all whoring is of the sexual kind.....although the jury's still out on the extent of Mr. Gurkert-Gannon's particular case.

[geniph]

26. OK, let me get this straight,

it's okay for someone under an assumed identity, under false pretenses, with an outstanding criminal judgement against him, to not only be in the White House, but given access to CLASSIFIED documents when they have no clearance - but it is an impeachment offense for a President to have consensual sex?

OK. Glad to have THAT cleared up and all.

Once again, the Clenis is the root of all evil.

(pun intended)

[BOSSHOG]

14. If "we" are making up lies about jeff gannon

then why don't "they" sue us? The easiest way to piss off a conservative is to post the truth.

[crispini]

15. Freeps: Here's why it's important:

WHO WAS HE BLOWING IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO GET THAT LEVEL OF ACCESS?

[janx]

23. That much seems to be clear now.

That guy, until 2003, was making money as a D.C. prostitute. His marketing angle was to use the U.S. Marine Corps. (which, incidentally, pisses ME off, if not the freepers).

Apparently his "career" took off. That's the only explanation.

[elehhhhna]

27. Or: WHO WAS BLOWING HIM?

[Old and In the Way]

31. Or, more importantly, was he a blackmailer or a blackmailee?

[Arkana]

19. LOL! Talk about hypocrates! (purposeful misspelling)

"This is crap! Liberals are making up lies about Jeff Gannon and the Administration, and attempting to paint the Bush Administration as hypocrites. Can't this be considerered libel or slander or something?"

Change a few of the words:

"This is crap! (Wingnuts) are making up lies about (John Kerry and the Democrats), and attempting to paint the (Democrats) as hypocrites. Can't this be considerered libel or slander or something?"

and you get what we asked ourselves all during Campaign 2004. Sorry, Freepers, but it ain't slander if it's true!

[geniph]

28. Ohmigawd, I wish they WOULD sue for libel (or slander)

FYI, freeptards, libel is in writing, slander is generally word of mouth. Just trying to be helpful there.

Wish they WOULD sue - in this country, a libel suit must first prove that the allegation is false, and second, that it caused damage. A lawsuit would establish the collusion of the WH and the RW fake press beyond a shadow of a doubt - and, incidentally, make Gannon the #1 Leatherboy of the Week. Hope his PO box is still active. He'll be getting a LOT of inquiries, I think.

[MsTryska]

22. *lol* it's not a lie when there's photographic evidence,

silly freeper.

[ultraist]

29. I'm glad they see the part about the Bush admin being HYPOCRITES!

freeper quote: "This is crap! Liberals are making up lies about Jeff Gannon and the Administration, and attempting to paint the Bush Administration as hypocrites. Can't this be considerered libel or slander or something?"

That's right, freeper boy, the Bush admin are HYPOCRITES.

BWHAHAHAHA!!! He still insists these are lies! What a good little cult follower.