Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Halliburton in Chapter 11?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tims Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:05 AM
Original message
Halliburton in Chapter 11?
I was talking recently to a friend whose father was involved in a law suit with a company which was later purchased by Halliburton. He now has to try to recover damages from Halliburton. When he received a package from Halliburton's legal department, he was expecting either a settlement agreement or at least details of an appeal. What he received instead was a set of legal documents explaining why they were exempt from paying any claims due to the fact that they are currently covered under Chapter 11 bankruptcy rules.

It seems that Halliburton has created a vast network of offshore entities, most of which are officially in bankruptcy and seeming to exist solely for the purpose of shielding the company from creditors while the company, as a whole, is reaping huge profits.

Has anyone else heard anything like this and can anyone confirm it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bankruptcy Court Stays Asbestos Claims Against Dresser Industries Inc.
Thursday February 14 (2002), 7:04 pm Eastern Time

Press Release
SOURCE: Halliburton Company

Bankruptcy Court Stays Asbestos Claims Against Dresser Industries Inc. In Harbison-Walker Chapter 11 Filing

DALLAS, Feb. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL - news) today announced that a U.S. Bankruptcy Court has issued a temporary restraining order staying more than 200,000 pending asbestos claims against its subsidiary Dresser Industries, Inc. The ruling came in connection with today's filing of a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code by Harbison-Walker Refractories Company.

Harbison-Walker, which faces a large number of asbestos-related claims, said it would seek to reorganize its finances in Chapter 11 aided by a trust responsible for resolving all pending and future asbestos-related claims asserted against it. The stay is temporary until the bankruptcy court holds a hearing, which is expected during the next two weeks.

The stayed claims represent a majority of the pending asbestos claims against all Halliburton Company subsidiaries. Approximately 132,000 of the stayed claims are refractory claims that Harbison-Walker agreed to be responsible for when it was spun-off from Dresser Industries in 1992.

The balance of the stayed claims are pre-1992 refractory claims and other asbestos claims against Dresser Industries that are covered in whole or in part by the same insurance coverage.


Source http://www.mesothel.com/pages/apg_hw_bank_pag.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tims Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. This wasn't an asbestos claim
And it was a separate Halliburton company than the one you mentioned. The question I have is how many such companies exist? One for each law suit?

The thing about the asbestos claim is the chapter 11 filing was based on POSSIBLY FUTURE losses. The subsidiary is still profitable and would only face POSSIBLE bankruptcy 10 or more years down the line, but in the meantime, they are allowed to file and stop ALL creditors and pay absolutely nothing to the asbestos claimants while reaping profits.

It seems rather bogus to be able to turn a profit while turning away creditors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. OK, take the company name & the phrase "chapter 11" and google them
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 11:23 AM by BlueEyedSon
This is an example of the process though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well..how does that work?
If a company files under chapter 11, are they allowed to have sort of sub companies..that continue to be profitable..while the stockholders of the chapter 11 company hold worthless stocks? How does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's how it works with K-Mart...
Bankruptcy is just one of the methods corporations use to take the money and run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcoursen Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Trump
I don't know how it works, but it seems to work for the Donald.

He is all over TV bragging about how rich he is and all that, meanwhile his casinos in AC are tanking and I believe have filed for bankruptcy. Certainly hasn't hurt his lifestyle any. he'll probably come out ahead when all is said and done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcoursen Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. original company bankrupt?
Could it be that the original company was bankrupt, and that that bankrupcies, and the protection therein, transfered to Halliburton when they purchased the original company?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, tell me again how a corporation is like a 'person'?
Can I designate someone to take all my debts for me and still continue to take money?

How does this work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. On the upside, you can vote, but corporations can't
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC