Charlie Rose on the Voting/Election Anomoly 'Rumors'

[Dover]

Anybody catch it? John Schwartz from the NYT and Sen. Nadler were the guests. They covered the real and potential problems pretty well, but concluded that there was just no evidence this election was stolen (barring some new revelation), although conceded that there is no way to prove it wasn't either.

So focus on changes for next time....although they said the Republicans might again vote against any kind of checks and balances of the e-vote system (ie - paper trail).

They ALL REALLY want to put this election behind us don't they...speaking the same message with one voice. Even my local left leaning paper repeats this mantra.

[Swamp Rat]

1. It is also rumored that Charlie Rose commits bestiality with chickens.

Guess we'll have to take his word for it that he doesn't, though I've heard no denials nor evidence as of yet.

[SoSleeplessinSoCal]

2. Charlie is not a trustworthy voice

I have watched Charlie Rose for years and debated on his forum for the past year. He is generally considered too soft on the neo-cons and I have almost completely stopped watching his shows.

This election brought out the true colors of the so-called Liberal media. It ain't Liberal in the least. Not in the way it was or should be. A Liberal media would be healthy for a democracy. A good government should withstand and defend itself to all scrutiny and challenges.

What we have is a White House now completely closed off to scrutiny and the media isn't even complaining about it. We have to come to the Internet to get our dose of Liberal "Journalism". Which is what needs to be out there in the real world for all Americans to see.

[krkaufman]

3. VIDEO: Cong. Nadler on Rose, Nov12, discussing voting issues

Go here for video of Congressman Nadler's appearance on Charlie Rose...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=201&topic_id=3647

[Dover]

4. Excellent........thanks!

I like the part where they suggest that all the speculation will end any moment and we'll all just move on.........hehe..snort!

Why should any citizen accept an unverifiable election?

[tommcintyre]

5. More media lockdown/spin :(

http://www.independentmediasource.com/evotingfraud.htm

6. So since there is NO EVIDENCE Bush won the election--

The simple answer is to just consider him an "enemy combatant in the White House"

[tommcintyre]

7. Stop mincing words. ;=} "Terrorist will do. n/t