Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So does * have a mandate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:39 AM
Original message
So does * have a mandate?
What's the definition of mandate? I think that a polarized country is still anything but a mandate.

And * saying 'Murica has spoken. 1/2 of America has spoken and someone has to make that perfectly clear. What can we do to get the word out that America has not spoken in the way that he claims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think he said he had a mandate after the
2001 theft of the presidency, didn't he? I think he needs a dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. a mandate is only as good as your next decision.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alevensalor Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. This goes to the root of our problem
In the Democratic party, we don't know how to manipulate, spin, distort, and control the way they do. We're weak now more than ever, and I am sad to say I don't have a solution at the moment.

I'm still reeling from the election results, truthfully.

We need to fight, but how?

~A!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. We could manipulate and spin it..
.. but as thinking 'Muricans, we don't buy into it from ANYONE! * or JFK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you consider 30 percent of the registered voters who voted a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. no
The passion and commitment you saw on our side during the campaign still exists. Nearly half the people in this country really hate the man and his policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hell no! n/t
Professor 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not even close...
He's got a small majority on paper...which he got through slander, fear-mongering, and outright voter intimidation and fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes he does and it's absolutely frightening
Just one look at what he did without one should give anyone pause about what is to come.

The scariest thing is not only did he get a mandate (which simply means he's got authorization from the country to pursue his agenda, since you asked) by popular vote, he also got a fundie values mandate. Fundamentalists voted in droves and the gay marriage amendment was passed by huge margins in 11 states.

Sadly, the rest of America and the Bush administration doesn't give a rat's ass that at least half of this country doesn't approve of what he's doing. Bluntly - Bush NEEDED a mandate to accomplish what he wants to do in the future and he made sure he got one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is no such thing as a mandate. People vote for a candidate for
different reasons, thus there is no 1 issue which would be a mandate. This will not stop him from claiming a mandate however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. No, absolutely not
Bush got a little more than half the vote. That's not a landslide. He carried the same states he carried in his first "election".

Furthermore, Bush won this election by appealing to fear and hatred. We were misdirected at the fear that was being generated towards terrorists. Osama's early Halloween party had no effect on the voting, and it should not have been expected to have had any. Osama's presence cuts both ways: (1) We are afraid of Osama and need the "tough" Bush to protect us; and (2) Osama is still on the lam and al Qaida is still creating havoc, therefore Bush has failed to protect and should be replced.

While that failed for Bush, he won because he was able to instill a fear and loathing of fellow Americans. He turned out a core constituancy of bigots who will resist equal rights for gays and sent out an army of poll watchers initially aimed at suppressing the Afro-American vote. And now he has the gall to call for "unity."

Unity on those terms is simply not possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. 'Mandate', my Cuban ass!
He won--- barely. 48% of America did NOT vote for the man, and he didn't break the 300+ EV barrier. That's NOT a 'mandate'.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes I believe at this point he does have a mandate
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 08:56 AM by fishnfla
1. Forget about the 55M that voted for K/E, they will now be brushed aside. American culture is now winnner take all, casual observers of the process see the GOP as the Super Bowl champs and a dynasty team at that

2. What liberal media? Look at all the papers that endorsed K/E, some even switched from 2000 endorsements. Wrong! Who's is going to speak for us?
Blogospheres? JOKE!!!! Thanks for the exit polls assholes! Howard Stern? Nope.
the moralists will listen to a pill popper and dildo man.

3. They now control the WH, the house and the senate, soon the Supreme court. The party apparatus owns the red states and the voting mechanisms. We're locked out. Can you say President Frist?

4. religion is the opiate of the masses, as long as Rove can push God, guns and gays, they own the churches.

5. Our only hope is they take too much rope and hang themselves. If i was a moderate republican, i would feel uncomfortable holding water for a bunch of fundie freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puddycat Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
17.  guns? I suggest ALL liberals get some NOW for protection from fundies
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 09:09 AM by puddycat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. One view of a mandate with regard to a political candidate would be....
...A claim made by a victorious candidate that the electorate has given him or her special authority to carry out campaign promises.

Such a definition would suggest that only the victorious candidate only goes with the authority given by those who voted for him. Those who voted against him or who did not vote at all are ignored except where that candidate made camaign promises which appealed to both sides. How do we hold George W Bush to his promises that he made to the moderates who voted for him? Where is the common ground which most of the electorate can agree? That is the rub isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geekgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. check out the NYTimes homepage (*puke warning*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. No, * does not have a mandate...
although it will not stop the * administration from claiming one. Half the country voted against him and that does not equal a mandate.

Let's also not forget that they ran a vile, hate-filled smear campaign because they couldn't run on truth. They got themselves elected by denigrating the military service of a decorated war veteran and completely distorting facts which says alot about their so-called moral values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Yasutomo Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. A 3-point margin is NOT a mandate!!
:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC