Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS radio news leads top of the hour with the DRAFT issue and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:51 PM
Original message
CBS radio news leads top of the hour with the DRAFT issue and
guess what, they said the internet is being used to spread this story via blogs and an email campaign initiated by unknown sources!!!!!!!

shades of Karl Rove! yesssssssssssssssssssssssss.

The broadcast was at 9 pm Los Angeles time on KNX all news CBS station.
there was a quote from charles rangle on his draft bill (he said nobody would take it seriously), a Bush clip saying he would not ever bring back the draft, and a comment that nobody in politics is thinking of the draft as anything but bad medicine. However the draft "whisper campaign" is getting media attention.

we all know that BUSH CERTAINLY WOULD BRING BACK THE DRAFT despite his denials, because of his massive record of flip-flop lies.

Msongs
Riverside CA

PS - spread the draft meme everywhere you go and write thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its called the Grapevine effect.
True, there's a problem with unsubstantiated rumors but lets face it, the net has been a better source of information over the last four years than tv over the last 3 decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush will have no choice but to bring it back
There's just no way to avoid it with what he's committed us to and God only knows what else he's got plans. <note to self: check PNAC>

The recruits are down. Our guard and reserve are stretched to the max (and who is ready to protect us on the home front?). Where are these bodies going to come from?

While the Republicans are countering with it being a bill authored by Democrats, it has Republican support for one thing. Also, I can't fault Rangle and other Dems for wanting to make sure that everyone is equal if there is a draft. No college deferments for Harvard and Yale, and tighter controls on agreements with other countries for those who have the money to put their kid on a private jet elsewhere in the world. If it's going to happen, it needs to be fair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A draft to force people to fight in offensive wars could never be fair
By its very nature, this could never be fair, given that the purpose is the criminal invasion of foreign countries. A draft to support truly defensive actions is a different matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bully For CBS! As Fox Says, "Some Peope Say..."
Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutInTheBack40 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did they mention it is a bill by Democrats that is calling for the draft?
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 12:34 AM by OutInTheBack40
How did they spin it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's DemocratIC.
I am a Democrat. Democrat is a noun, a proper noun. My party is the Democratic Party. Democratic is an adjective.

Don't you know the difference between an adjective and a noun?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. drafting both men and women, heres the bills
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 12:25 AM by Sven77
http://www.vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/105146.php

"Pending legislation in the House and Senate (twin bills S 89 and HR 163) would time the program so the draft could begin at early as Spring 2005 -- conveniently just after the 2004 presidential election!"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Draft*

$28 million has been added to the 2004 Selective Service System (SSS) budget to prepare for a military draft that could start as early as June 15, 2005. SSS must report to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the system, which has lain dormant for decades, is ready for activation. Please see website: http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view the SSS Annual Performance Plan - Fiscal Year 2004.

The Pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to fill all 10,350 draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots nationwide.. Though this is an unpopular election year topic, military experts and influential members of Congress are suggesting that if Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan proves accurate, the U.S. may have no choice but to draft.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5146.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. I have two draft age sons
I have been dreading this since the Supreme Court put this lunacy in motion four years ago. I am terribly afraid that all the focus on the draft is not so much a campaign issue as a PR effort to get the country ready to accept the resumption of the draft after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. I tried to post this on the freeper site
they revoked my posting privilege

Typical--they are over there saying that Dems want a draft. What a bunch of losers. They are oblivious to the fact that they are planning to vote for a draft with a vote for *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutInTheBack40 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Mixed messages
Why is it the only signers of the draft bill are Democrats? I hate to point out the obvious but that makes the whole draft issue smell like "Dems want a draft".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. a draft would bring this country DOWN
we flat out ain't gonna take it. we will rock and we will roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC