Which is the More Frightening Scenario?

[Beetwasher]

That Bushco. is so incompetent that they regularly get played by the likes of Bin Laden and Chalabi or that they might actually be in cahoots w/ them still?

The way I see it, I see no other possibilities for their actions and behavior and the results thereof.

[ibegurpard]

1. the 2nd scenario is more frightening

The first scenario means they've been played for fools and are not as invulnerable as we've led ourselves to believe.

[eaprez]

2. Neither

They are in cahoots with the saudis - which is why terrorists investigations before 911 were nipped in the bud.

[Alerter_]

3. If there is another terrorist attack, Bush must resign

After he screwed up and allowed 911, he was given everything he wanted to stop terrorism. Instead, he was scammed by everybody - including Cheney and Halliburton - and he's literally too stupid to know any better. If there is even the appearance of a successful terrorist attack before the elections, Bush MUST resign, or the Treasury/Secret Service need to take him down and Congress needs to have him deposed. No joke.

[eaprez]

4. I would agree with you....

...if there is another attack....it proves his policies don't work, that he didn't keep us safe. That's the way I see it. However, I am really confused at all the talking heads who HANDS DOWN say that a terrorist attack would insure Bush's re-election. Someone please explain that logic to me.

[mike1963]

6. The "logic" behind that argument is the old "don't change horses" BS.

Which is probably good advice if your horse is healthy and swimming. It don't work so well after the poor thing has done drowned.

[maggrwaggr]

5. I agree with you except

he needs to be taken out now.

He's proven that he is unable to drive the car. It's time to take away the keys.

Before anyone else gets killed.

Why wait for one more dead US soldier or one more terrorist attack?