Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Lieberman problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 11:58 PM
Original message
The Lieberman problem
Straight up.

The Democratic Party has an identity problem....This identity problem isn't manifested in the public's perception of the party, but rather, it is the RESULT of the party's own unraveled core....Its origins can be traced to the 2000 "election" and has solidified itself by constant, unprincipled appeasements to our rivals on practically every issue imaginable....Joe Lieberman has capitalized on the knowledge of this internal dilemma to his benefit and the DLC's relentless push to drive the left's influence off the playing table....The philosophical claim to this party is up for grabs....His gambit proposes a RIGHTWARD shift in the hopes of redefining our collective image among centrist voters and he's openly challenging his own party's contenders to take him on....

BUT...

Despite searching far and wide among pro-Democratic websites, liberal/progressive message boards, ect, you'll scarcely find evidence, financial or agenda-driven support, to account for his party-leading poll numbers in the mainstream press....Some folks like to hang their hats on the theory that polling data is skewered and unreliable, but more often than not, it's surprisingly accurate....The proof is that no one here or on the street denies his standing as of this moment....He can afford to be brazen if he chooses...Wether or not he believes that his numbers are cosmetic, he is calling the left's bluff and it must be answered.

If we're to conclude that the "name-recognition" factor alone accounts for his high standing among Democratic voters, then he's getting a free ride that must finally be challenged.

So, WHO'S IT GONNA BE?

There's a reluctance among many here to see our candidates going at each other's throats, but this coming election will not be for the squeamish and the time to rewind our core for the sake of broader mass appeal, let alone the party's future, is NOW....Purging the "Bush-lite" candidate early on will only help to fine tune the party's goal, which is to DEFEAT BUSH, lest we forget what we're fighting for....In the coming debates (and I hope the candidates lurk here occassionally :D) I'd suggest that non-DLC sanctioned candidates begin the process of dismembering this imposter by questioning where his true allegiances are stemming from, foreign and domestic.

The "faith-based initiave", the censorship-implying-holier-than-thou assaults on on the entertainment industry, The Homeland Security issue, the TOTAL embrace of the "pre-emptive" doctrine, the IFCJ/Pat Robertson projects....All fair game to those who recognize that the RACE isn't won by holding the opponent's hand as you approach the finish line.

From outside the ring, Al Gore should take his lumps, also....A total repudiation of Lieberman is due, and i mean TOTAL....There's no question in my mind that he absolutely BLEW IT when taking Lieberman as his VP....Gore, so consumed with distancing himself from Clinton on the advice of "image handlers", took Lieberman's "statesmanly" charade too close to heart and came to find out later that this wimp couldn't be counted on to hold firm to his principles in that wretched fall of 2000...What do you make of a man who's willing to publicly trash his own party's sitting president in front of the entire country and then, 2 short years later, deliberately subvert his own party's chance to rightly reclaim the White House?


Politics isn't just a seasonal challenge among philosophical parties, it's also a challenge among like-minded people to find a LEADER who'll chart the course of its destiny....This party can ill afford to let the likes of Lieberman/DLC types to fracture the foundations of the party....We've got to define ourselves because our opponents
are doing it FOR US!!....We're too concerned with looking "united" and it's a smokescreen for a deeper problem....The only thing uniting us right now is the agreed upon mix of confusion, disgust and impotence....Either somebody STANDS UP and claims the party or pack it in for another 4 years....My patience is getting past the "worn thin" stage....We need a CONSTRUCTIVE fight if we want attention, folks....You should be begging for it, because this "play nice" attitude ain't getting the job done.

Let's face it: If this country hasn't lost its hard-on for the Bush league's "pre-emptive, civil rights-trampling, cheap labor, corporate-sheltering conservatism" by '04, then nobody's gonna beat him....But I do know this: Joe Lieberman's brand of "conservatism" doesn't stand a CHANCE next to the real thing....Only a 180 degree REAL alternative can inspire my vote....This man is not an alternative that I can support and the Democratic Party will find itself in a world of hurt for many years to come if it doesn't start defining itself on its own terms....The DLC can't win without us, but I'm convinced that we CAN without THEM.

I'm new to this site and I thouroughly enjoy this forum....Aside from much of the bickering going on, this place is a real find and I'm grateful that I've been welcomed so kindly....I've noticed that some threads have ignited a "gender war" tonight and it's not very constructive, in my opinion....It's not my place to make demands of anyone here, but for what it's worth, I think we'd all be best served by keeping our eye on the ball and setting all the petty stuff aside....We can draw more people to our cause if we make a better effort toward emphasizing what's really important....Time is of the essence, right?


:kick: KICK IT!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your preaching to the converted
there are only two Lieberman apologists out of 30,000 DU members. Wait till primary season, then the wheat will be seperated from the chaff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. No time to wait.
We need to go after him NOW....We can't sit back and watch the calender....Seeing Joe Lieberman at the fore-front of the party doesn't inspire much confidence, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to DU :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Awesome! Laughing my ass off
couldn't agree more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Oh that is great Wonk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryharrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't thing has the slightest chance of being nominated.
His number ARE purely name recognition. No one new is going to hear of him. He has nowhere to go but down. Dean on the other hand is the exact opposite lots and lots of people still haven't heard of him. And polls show that when they do, his support goes up. He's the only one who has been steadily going up this whole primary season so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocinante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. That was
a hell of an opening statement. Congratulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks!
I'm glad I found this place and it looks like I'm in good company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Far as I can see, Lieberman is his own worst enemy, attacking all the
other democrats now, and I do mean all of them....hopefully
he's also bringing down the DLC with him and democrats will go back to being REAL democrats in the DNC.

For anyone who is an old fashioned DNC democrat he just comes across as a giant 0

And by the way, when Gore does not endorse him, he' s finished. And
there is no way Gore can endorse Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. My problem with Gore
...is that he brought this guy into prominence....This is a blunder on his part that gave Lieberman all the credentials he'd need to run on his own and we definately could use Gore's own repudiation of this guy to REALLY sink him....It's unlikely that Gore would openly criticize Lieberman because there's the 2 fold blow-back.

1) Gore would admit to choking on this guy as a VP nominee.

2) The Right would never let us forget it.

But it can be done effectively if Gore expresses a fundemental shift in Lieberman's views that are inconsistent with the party's interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocinante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I feel that Gore
won't have any problem dumping Joe. He will do it at a time of his choosing. Little joke there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. He was selected as VP (who knows Y) before he supported Bush's war
and Bush's tax refunds, etc etc//

I also thought it was crazy for Gore to pick Lieberman and
it really turned me off....but, he had advisers in those days
who were prolly trying to have Gore defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Well.....
but, he had advisers in those days
who were prolly trying to have Gore defeated.


I don't shrug off incompetence until somebody proves to me that Gore's handlers were "GOP CONSPIRATORS".

Our failures are of our own doing.....It's easier and more truthful to accept that these advisors did a flat POOR JOB of advising Gore into choosing Lieberman over a more progressive VP candidate....The fact is that these clowns let themselves be intimidated by the Clinton bashers into proposing this strange collaboration....The surprising reaction to many on the selection of Lieberman, including seasoned Democratic insiders, was genuine....Gore wasn't savvy enough to see through this bullshit....He did what he was told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Gore's VP "short list": Evan Bayh, John Kerry, John Edwards and Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. LIEberman selected as VP because
Gore's "handlers" and "advisers" thought he would appeal to the "soccer" moms and "office park" dads due to his cultural conservatism. Why the "experts" think this demographic is so conservative I do not know. Does having 2.2 kids, a house and an SUV automatically cause one to become a right-winger? I think not.

The Dems don't really need to do much to keep the Jewish vote that's for sure and a lot of Demo Jews really do not support LIEberman because he is SO conservative. Sure there was a certain amount of ethnic pride knowing that "one of your own" was nominated for the second highest office in the land but that quickly evaporated the more LIEberman spoke out on issues.

When I saw him and Gore speak at Kiener Plaza in downtown St Louis in the summer of 2000 I was more moved by Gore than by LIEberman and we all know that Gore is not the most dynamic of speakers. I left shortly after LIEberman began speaking. The man turns my stomach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Lieberman's a DINO
Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. A "DINO"?
I admit that he's a dinosaur, but I never saw him on The Flintstones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. DINO equalls
Democrat In Name Only


.....fyi....RINO means Republican In Name Only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL!!!
GREAT!

Thanks for the heads up....My lexicon just found a new word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. I am not a Lieberman supporter
But that claim falls apart upon closer scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Agree...kiss of death. Gore will NOT support Lieberman n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. What are the IFCJ/Pat Robertson projects you mention in original post
Not that I need further convincing that Joe is just a disaster waiting to happen at the top of a Dem ticket, but what is that about?

the IFCJ/Pat Robertson projects ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Here.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. this is worse (for Lieberman anyway):
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1213-05.htm

Lynne Cheney-Joe Lieberman Group Puts Out a Blacklist

AN aggressive attack on freedom has been launched upon America's college campuses. Its perpetrators seek the elimination of ideas and activities that place Sept. 11 in historical context, or critique the so-called war on terrorism.
(snip)

Whaddya say to THAT, Lieberbush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. This issue has been debunked here several times
When Lieberman heard about the report he repudiated it. But then again, when it comes to Lieberman, the facts matter little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocinante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. What does that mean
the facts matter little?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. When it comes to Lieberman they don't matter
People distort his actual record here all the time. Lieberman is Satan to most people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocinante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. All that I've Read
tonight that I am able to find shows that Joe is not a true Democrat.I'm just searching for validation of what you're saying. Until tonight I would have voted for Joe, but enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Go to project vote smart
And look at interest group ratings. You will see that a lot of the statements said here about Lieberman fall apart under faller scrutiny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. This is precisely my point!
I just can't believe so many people are indifferent about this guy's high approval numbers!....When exactly will it become something to actually be concerned about?....When it's too late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. What high approval numbers? In New Hampshire? nope In Iowa? nope
those are the places right now that count.

Lieberman will NOT be the democratic nominee.

In those places right now Dean is leading, with 20 some odd
percent while Lieberman has something like 4 percent.

So what on earth are you talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red_house Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I'm not saying.....
....that Lieberman will win the nomination....That is highly unlikely, but to cast aside the fact that among registered DEMOCRATS this guy is leading the pack says something about the lack of a cohesive message from the party where he is clearly the exception among the other candidates....Lieberman is the most conservative Dem on the platform and he's leading in NATIONAL polls, albeit with a slim margin, for months....This is of concern because if he's LEADING, it makes the alternative's position look ineffective by comparison....He'll stay there until somebody musters the courage to challenge him.

Nobody has stirred this party enough to drop him down a serious few notches and we've been at it for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Plan B
> There's no question in my mind that he absolutely BLEW IT when taking Lieberman as his VP

He really did!

How long would PNAC have let Gore live if he had taken office?
They would have JFK'ed him,
then Lieberman would have given them their war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Lieberman has a small, deeply devoted base w/ some $...
but in general, he has a serious money problem that is only getting worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. Thank you Pal, for pointing the SALIENT facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. Lieberbush? Good one. Haven't seen that before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. The "real" Lieberman problem
is that his selection for the VP slot was an old-fashioned, insider "play" for the Jewish vote and to appease the DLC. It was about on part with nominating Geraldine Ferraro or Lloyd Bentsen.

He is, ultimately, the poster child for the "old way" of doing politics; nominating or selecting candidtes to appeas special interest groups.

To accept that Lieberman is close to some mythical, polling-derived "center" is an act of surrender. It is saying that the right has one, and the "center" of American politics is whereever the Karl Rove's of this world choose to place it.

We need to stop fighting on the enemy's territory and open a new front, or fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roberthall10 Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. Holy Joe's Problem
Lieberman was brought onto the 2000 ticket to provide moral uplift. Ironic that he is the one Dem candidate willing to turn his attention from the moral squalor of the administration falsified case for war in Iraq. Ends justify means to Holy Joe, evidently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC