|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
TruthIsAll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:17 PM Original message |
Poll question: Now are you convinced of a Bush 9/11 LIHOP? If yes, Impeach Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not just "impeach", but also "convict". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DenverDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I dare call it TREASON. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. I'd call it MURDER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DenverDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Either way, it's a capital crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. It would certainly pass the "high crimes and misdemeanors" litmus test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Impeach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mouse7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. No point in trying to impeach with GOP majorities in Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. Go directly to Jail, fuck impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DenverDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Not just criminal investigation for the propagandists, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Undercutter (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Hi Undercutter!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 03:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Welcome to DU! There's a glossary of abbreviations that are used here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 08:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. now they tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. It was incompetence. Impeach. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. impeachment is a political and practical impossiblity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. It was a simple case of grotesque ineptitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. BULL SHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 09:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. If they win the election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amazona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. i voted incompetence/impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. If known the security breech, you must impeach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. LIHOP do not impeach for it takes a majority of the votes in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
worldgonekrazy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Fine. Try and impeach him and make the Repubs discredit themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. Not convinced, Impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mot78 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
20. It was incompetence, and he should be impeached for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. It was MIHOP but it wasn't BUSH that "made it happen" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillZBubb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. He should be impeached for Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-10-04 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
26. The 2 1/2 year cover up of Condiliar's incompetence is the crime. Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durutti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-11-04 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
28. Still no proof of LIHOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-11-04 04:32 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. suspicion > investigation > proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wapsie B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-11-04 05:01 AM Response to Original message |
30. Wouldn't this be called Treason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC