Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Musician's Union response to "indecency " legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:09 PM
Original message
Musician's Union response to "indecency " legislation
American Federation of Musicians
of the United States and Canada
AFFILIATED WITH THE A.F.L.-C.I.O.

OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
THOMAS F. LEE
1501 Broadway, Suite 600
New York, NY 10036
(212) 869-1330 · FAX (212) 764-6134

March 26, 2004


Dear Senator:

Congress has responded to recent broadcast events, such as the Super Bowl half-time show, which have offended a large segment of the general public. In the next few days the Senate will be considering S.2056, the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act. The American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (AFM) appreciates the concern about keeping the airwaves free from indecent material. However, S. 2056 places too much of the blame and too large a fine on the backs of individual artists and performers rather than on the broadcasters who make the final decision what goes on the air. Apart from the excessive fines on individual performers, S. 2056 also presents First Amendment problems. “Indecency” is a very broad and subjective term.

In the present legislation, an individual performer would be fined more than the broadcaster - $500,000 compared to $275,000 for a first offense. There is no distinction made for individuals who knowingly or unknowingly violate broadcast decency standards. Considering that the FCC has never fined an individual performer, but only the broadcaster, this is a striking change in public policy and one that is of great concern to America’s artistic community.

The legislation before you is an overreaction to what is a legitimate concern. I ask you to reject the current version of this bill. The creative community in general and the AFM in particular are happy to work with you on finding a more reasonable solution.

Sincerely and fraternally,

Thomas F. Lee
President
AFM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC