TIME Mag story in Aug 2002 - Contempaneous refutation of WH/FOX

[swag]

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,333835,00.html

Seems to me the "transcript" discussed in the below-referenced thread is refuted by this story in Time.

Shove this up the ass of the next Freeper you see. Wear double gloves!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1278604


I'm starting a new thread, because we'll be hearing a lot of this lie today.

[displacedtexan]

1. Wow!

:wow:

[swag]

2. I sent the link to Fox, but that's like pissing up a rope

Please share this link with freepers, friends, journalists.

Faux lies must be killed stop-dead.

[Birthmark]

3. Thanks. I've already put it to good use.

[buycitgo]

4. well.....both CNN and Faux say there's audio and/or video

how's he going to reconcile this, other than to say he was doing what he was told?

this doesn't wash with his recent statements at all, and it could severely damage his credibility

I hope to hell they're aware of this, and Clarke will DEAL with it during his testimony (inoculate?), otherwise, you can be sure some pug is going to bring it up, whether on the commission, or Richard the Bullethead, who testifies after him.

[swag]

5. Well, we'll see

He has plenty of insider corroboration (O'Neill, Bush to Woodward, etc.).

This is probably a blip for dittoheads, honestly.

At any rate, would be nice to have all the evidence on the WH/FAUX tape/transcript.

v. skeptical, here, given the contempo-revelations in the Time article.

[louis-t]

6. The time article is very informative...

starting to get a good handle on what went on. I see why B*sh didn't want any of this to come out. It puts cracks in his story about what a great job he did and how everything's Clinton's fault. Some of the descriptions of B*sh wandering around the situation room fits with what I thought about why he sat at the school for 25 min. after WTC attacks. He was waiting for someone to tell him what to do. He really didn't know.