Has Howard Dean been vindicated?

[HFishbine]

By Richard Clarke's revelations?

[fujiyama]

1. I'd say...

to a large part yes. He's right, but then again, many of us already knew he was.

[liberalnurse]

8. Yes, and he will continue to be recognized

for his insight.

[ThirdWheelLegend]

2. Huh? More like alot of us have been vindicated

:)

I don't remember Howard Dean questioning every move of the administration after 9/11.

That was people like DUers and other free thinkers :)


TWL

[HFishbine]

4. Recall early December

Dean took a lot of flak for entertaining the notion that Bush knew.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/12/7/133519.shtml

[Jacobin]

3. He made it "ok" to say the U.S. is not safer without Saddam

I noticed congresscritters last week now saying that when they couldn't say it before. Of course, Kerry is still chanting Smirky's little lie.

[patricia92243]

5. Of course he was right! And now that Kerry is the nominee, his..........

representatives need to get out and blamblast Bus and everything his administration even think about saying.

Kerry, himself, can't do much of this - just like Bush doesn't. But he can have his people go full-steam ahead!

That includes Dean, Clarke and whoever already has the spotlight.

[OneTwentyoNine]

6. Yes...and the whole cast and crew of DU IMO

What Clarke said has been in serious discussion on DU since about 9/12 and there are still a host of answers about 9/11 that he didn't touch in the interview.

Of course to the Freep crowd all our discussion about 9/11 and Iraq was nothing but Bush bashing and careless speculation.

Oh yeah????

David

[ThirdWheelLegend]

7. That's what I meant

In my reply above. Dean came on to the scene late, to campaign.
We DUers and others like us have been saying this stuff since 9/12/01.

There was never any link to Iraq, yet that was the first thing the misadministration could think of.

TWL